Am 25.10.2010 19:12, schrieb luciano de souza:
7. IUP - It fulfills all the requirements. Previous experiences using
Lua and IUP, graphical tool kit developed by brazilian reseachers,
shows excelent results. Graphical interfaces can be created by blind
programmers, without any coordenate, using
IUP 2.x are not compatible with screen readers. The reason is the
excessive usage of Canvas Draw. I did a large number of tests with IUP
and Lua and I can assure IUP 3.1 and 3.2, the last version, are very
good so in Linux as in Windows. For this reason, I would like to
translate IUP 3.2.
Yes, we
Am 26.10.2010 16:18, schrieb luciano de souza:
IUP 2.x are not compatible with screen readers. The reason is the
excessive usage of Canvas Draw. I did a large number of tests with IUP
and Lua and I can assure IUP 3.1 and 3.2, the last version, are very
good so in Linux as in Windows. For this
2010/10/26, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com:
Am 26.10.2010 16:18, schrieb luciano de souza:
IUP 2.x are not compatible with screen readers. The reason is the
excessive usage of Canvas Draw. I did a large number of tests with IUP
and Lua and I can assure IUP 3.1 and 3.2, the last
I understand. After running H2pas, I had erros in all rows with array
of const. The arguments are not constants indeed. They are ihandle or
pihandle as the first one is. So but when I use varargs probabibly all
the arguments have the same type: pihandle. I believe the second
alternative will
Am 26.10.2010 17:00, schrieb luciano de souza:
I understand. After running H2pas, I had erros in all rows with array
of const. The arguments are not constants indeed. They are ihandle or
pihandle as the first one is. So but when I use varargs probabibly all
the arguments have the same type:
Hello FPC,
Monday, October 25, 2010, 7:12:25 PM, you wrote:
lds 1. tform - it fulfills the items 1 and 3. A blind person cannot
lds program it. At first, because Lazarus environment is not accessible
lds and a blind people prefer to use only hard code without move objects
lds on a form.
It's really interesting. After looking for so libraries, it would be
fantastic to find a solution with tform. But, regarding everything
needs to be created only writing codes, without opening the
inaccessible interface of Lazarus, do you believe can it be done?
I give you an example using Lua.
2010/10/25 luciano de souza luchya...@gmail.com:
[snip]
My question is: is it possible to create all the interface with tform
without using the Lazarus interfaces, in other words, only typing
codes in a text editor?
Yes, but you will write more in Pascal than with IUP.
Marcos Douglas
2010/10/25 luciano de souza luchya...@gmail.com
My question is: is it possible to create all the interface with tform
without using the Lazarus interfaces, in other words, only typing
codes in a text editor?
Yes, everything you can do in the form designer can be done in code too.
Take a
Marcos, it's not exactly a problem. My example in Lua is supplied only
to show the hard code styly needed to my targets.
Even if more code is required, it's always possible to enclose the
complexity in classes. I really like Pascal and I expect to find a
solution using only Pascal.
I don't know
2010/10/25 luciano de souza luchya...@gmail.com
Vincent, You got the point. When I came across LFMs, I thought a hard
code focus could not be used.
But, I can imagine another problem. Lazarus interface is unbelievably
worse. So I would like to compile my projects only doing: fpc
project.pp.
2010/10/25 luciano de souza:
Finally, I ask: does someone have an idea what can I do? Does someone
know other interfaces container based compatible with Pascal?
I much prefer code based designing compared to Visual Form Designing.
In a similar way you can compare OpenOffice or MS-Office to
13 matches
Mail list logo
