C Western schreef:
Пётр Косаревский wrote:
In the math unit are the CompareValue functions only for signed
integers. Why not for DWORD and QWORD?
I guess, that it's Delphi mimicing implementation (because it is
Delphi-like).
And it can be tricky to distinguish signed and unsigned
Quoting Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
C Western schreef:
ð£ÔÒ ëÏÓÁÒÅ×ÓËÉÊ wrote:
In the math unit are the CompareValue functions only for signed
integers. Why not for DWORD and QWORD?
I guess, that it's Delphi mimicing implementation (because it is
Delphi-like).
And it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
Quoting Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
C Western schreef:
ð£ÔÒ ëÏÓÁÒÅ×ÓËÉÊ wrote:
In the math unit are the CompareValue functions only for signed
integers. Why not for DWORD and QWORD?
I guess, that it's Delphi mimicing implementation (because it is
Пётр Косаревский wrote:
In the math unit are the CompareValue functions only for signed integers. Why not
for DWORD and QWORD?
I guess, that it's Delphi mimicing implementation (because it is Delphi-like).
And it can be tricky to distinguish signed and unsigned expression values.
Like,
a:
Hi,
In the math unit are the CompareValue functions only for signed integers. Why not
for DWORD and QWORD?
I tested with the program below.
For DWord is works correctly, presumely because the int64 overload is used.
For QWord without typecast the code doesn't compile, because the compile
In the math unit are the CompareValue functions only for signed integers. Why
not
for DWORD and QWORD?
I guess, that it's Delphi mimicing implementation (because it is Delphi-like).
And it can be tricky to distinguish signed and unsigned expression values.
Like,
a: qword;
a-1 --- ???
