Great !
Thanks a lot.
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:01:08PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Ewald wrote:
Now, for the implementation of ProcessorCount I've got code here that
reads the amount of processor cores from `/proc/cpuinfo` (linux only I
think) and some assembly code [asmmode att]
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 08:49:51AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:01:08PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Ewald wrote:
Now, for the implementation of ProcessorCount I've got code here that
reads the amount of processor cores from
On 27/12/12 22:38, Ewald wrote:
Hmmm, that;s indeed quite some different output you've got there. Mine
looks like this:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 23
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8600 @
Once upon a time, on 12/28/2012 11:01 AM to be precise, patspiper said:
On 27/12/12 22:38, Ewald wrote:
Hmmm, that;s indeed quite some different output you've got there.
Mine looks like this:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model
Once upon a time, on 12/28/2012 06:46 AM to be precise,
microc...@zoho.com said:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:01:08PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Ewald wrote:
Now, for the implementation of ProcessorCount I've got code here that
reads the amount of processor cores from `/proc/cpuinfo`
On 28/12/12 17:00, Ewald wrote:
Once upon a time, on 12/28/2012 11:01 AM to be precise, patspiper said:
On 27/12/12 22:38, Ewald wrote:
Hmmm, that;s indeed quite some different output you've got there.
Mine looks like this:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu
On 28/12/12 17:41, patspiper wrote:
On 28/12/12 17:00, Ewald wrote:
Once upon a time, on 12/28/2012 11:01 AM to be precise, patspiper said:
On 27/12/12 22:38, Ewald wrote:
Hmmm, that;s indeed quite some different output you've got there.
Mine looks like this:
processor : 0
On 28/12/12 17:46, patspiper wrote:
On 28/12/12 17:41, patspiper wrote:
On 28/12/12 17:00, Ewald wrote:
Once upon a time, on 12/28/2012 11:01 AM to be precise, patspiper said:
On 27/12/12 22:38, Ewald wrote:
Hmmm, that;s indeed quite some different output you've got there.
Mine looks like
In our previous episode, Ewald said:
cores' (no hyperthreading), and 0.5 if 'siblings' = 2 x 'cpu cores'
(hyperthreading enabled).
Yeah, that could work, but then again the actual format of the data may
be different measured over several distributions: suppose all `:` all of
the sudden
On 12/28/2012 10:46, patspiper wrote:
On 28/12/12 17:41, patspiper wrote:
On 28/12/12 17:00, Ewald wrote:
As I said, I didn't know formats of /proc/cpuinfo differ over
distributions/os'es, so it isn't safe to use this approach since all of the
sudden a simly system update *might* just break
Once upon a time, on 12/28/2012 04:41 PM to be precise, patspiper said:
As I said, I didn't know formats of /proc/cpuinfo differ over
distributions/os'es, so it isn't safe to use this approach since all
of the sudden a simly system update *might* just break your application.
True. A better
Once upon a time, on 12/28/2012 04:46 PM to be precise, patspiper said:
Try lscpu -p
At first sights that would be a worthy alternative to /proc/cpuinfo
indeed. Thanks for the hint.
--
Ewald
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Once upon a time, on 12/28/2012 05:59 PM to be precise, Marco van de
Voort said:
In our previous episode, Ewald said:
cores' (no hyperthreading), and 0.5 if 'siblings' = 2 x 'cpu cores'
(hyperthreading enabled).
Yeah, that could work, but then again the actual format of the data may
be
Hello Free Pascal community!
I'm pleased to announce the extension of TThread's interface to bring it
more on par with current Delphi versions.
Extensions:
Note: in the following list class means that the property or method is
a class property or method and thus can be called without a
Great! Keep up the good work ;-)
Rather funny actually... Quite some time ago I wrote my own threading
mechanism and decided to break compatibility with fpc's TThread
interface. Ever since I did that my own interface somehow became more
and more compatible again with the implementation of TThread
Ewald wrote:
Now, for the implementation of ProcessorCount I've got code here that
reads the amount of processor cores from `/proc/cpuinfo` (linux only I
think) and some assembly code [asmmode att] (tested on x86_64 and i386)
that *tries* to get the amount of cpu cores by the use of CPUID. The
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
- ProcessorCount (class):
Returns the count of CPU cores detected by the RTL. This is based
on the new global property System.GetCPUCount which needs to be
implemented per target. Currently only a default implementation exists
which returns
Hmmm, that;s indeed quite some different output you've got there. Mine
looks like this:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 23
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8600 @ 3.33GHz
stepping: 10
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:01:08PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Ewald wrote:
Now, for the implementation of ProcessorCount I've got code here that
reads the amount of processor cores from `/proc/cpuinfo` (linux only I
think) and some assembly code [asmmode att] (tested on x86_64 and i386)
20 matches
Mail list logo
