On 13 Oct 2008, at 08:16, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 13 Oct 2008, at 03:37, Paul Ishenin wrote:
Jonas Maebe wrote:
Boys, can you also add similar to delphi {$WARN xxx OFF} / {$WARN
xxx ON} to use them per unit?
Feel free to file a bug report with a feature request.
Or to submit a patch...
On 13 Oct 2008, at 03:37, Paul Ishenin wrote:
Jonas Maebe wrote:
I've committed a modified version of your patch (mainly extra error
checking). The parameters now are
-vq to show message numbers
-vm11004,1018 to mask the messages numbered 11004 and 1018
(you cannot put any other -vx
On 08 Oct 2008, at 13:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is another attempt which respects your comments.
Cmdline option:
-vm showns msg numbers in listing
-vm11004m1018 disables showing msg numbers 11004 and 1018
I've committed a modified version of your patch (mainly extra error
Jonas Maebe wrote:
Here is another attempt which respects your comments.
Cmdline option:
-vm showns msg numbers in listing
-vm11004m1018 disables showing msg numbers 11004 and 1018
I've committed a modified version of your patch (mainly extra error
checking). The parameters now are
-vq to
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 08:25:54PM +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote:
It's a good start, but this patch is not ready to be committed:
a) it is limited to 10 suppressions
b) people have to look up the error number in the message file first
c) if you change the limitation in a), the code will become
On 29 Sep 2008, at 16:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:49:29AM +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 29 Sep 2008, at 11:41, Paul Ishenin wrote:
Jonas Maebe ??:
That's just a hack, and you have to regenerate the message file
for every
new FPC release.
Ofcource,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:49:29AM +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 29 Sep 2008, at 11:41, Paul Ishenin wrote:
Jonas Maebe ??:
That's just a hack, and you have to regenerate the message file for every
new FPC release.
Ofcource, but what can we do simple fpc users ;)
Submit a patch.
