On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:39 +0100, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Contributions are more than welcome, as long as they adhere to a strict
rule: I don't publish documentation for a unit unless it is complete.
Does that mean that partial documented xml f
2010/12/6 Darius Blaszyk :
> On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:39 +0100, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>> Contributions are more than welcome, as long as they adhere to a strict
>> rule: I don't publish documentation for a unit unless it is complete.
>
> Does that mean that partial documented xml files are a
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:39 +0100, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> Contributions are more than welcome, as long as they adhere to a strict
> rule: I don't publish documentation for a unit unless it is complete.
Does that mean that partial documented xml files are allowed to be added
to SVN, but that
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
I did the unthinkable ;) by trying to write some documentation for an
FPC package. I searched FPC without success after which I got fpcdocs
from SVN, no luck either. I only found some files included in Lazarus
(\docs\xml\).
What is the plan for the la
I did the unthinkable ;) by trying to write some documentation for an
FPC package. I searched FPC without success after which I got fpcdocs
from SVN, no luck either. I only found some files included in Lazarus
(\docs\xml\).
What is the plan for the lack of documentation on packages? Should I add
p
