Re: [fpc-devel] Merge request for 3.2 fixes

2020-07-25 Thread J. Gareth Moreton
Ah, okay. On 25/07/2020 23:00, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote: J. Gareth Moreton > schrieb am Sa., 25. Juli 2020, 22:24: Since 3.2.0 has already had a public release, should the version number be incremented to 3.2.1 or some such? The version of t

Re: [fpc-devel] Merge request for 3.2 fixes

2020-07-25 Thread Sven Barth via fpc-devel
J. Gareth Moreton schrieb am Sa., 25. Juli 2020, 22:24: > Since 3.2.0 has already had a public release, should the version number > be incremented to 3.2.1 or some such? > The version of the fixes branch already *is* 3.2.1 since 20th June ( https://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=revi

Re: [fpc-devel] Merge request for 3.2 fixes

2020-07-25 Thread J. Gareth Moreton
Since 3.2.0 has already had a public release, should the version number be incremented to 3.2.1 or some such? Gareth aka. Kit On 25/07/2020 21:19, Marco van de Voort wrote: Op 2020-07-25 om 21:51 schreef Benito van der Zander: I looked in my repo, and they are in the list of regexpr fixes

Re: [fpc-devel] Merge request for 3.2 fixes

2020-07-25 Thread Marco van de Voort
Op 2020-07-25 om 21:51 schreef Benito van der Zander: I looked in my repo, and they are in the list of regexpr fixes to merge. http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/mergelogs32/regexr.html If Michael "Ok"s them, I'll merge them/. ___ fpc-devel maillist - f

Re: [fpc-devel] Merge request for 3.2 fixes

2020-07-25 Thread Benito van der Zander
and: https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=36603 a regression when passing empty strings to regexpr perhaps its follow-up: https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=36701 On 25.07.20 16:26, Martin wrote: Could the fix for issue https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=36017 be merged to f

[fpc-devel] Merge request for 3.2 fixes

2020-07-25 Thread Martin
Could the fix for issue https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=36017 be merged to fixes branch please? Unfortunately I missed that it wasn't merged before the release (I had it commented out in my tests, so I could see if anything else would break). But it would be nice to have it for 3.2.2.