Am 31.10.2017 10:47 schrieb "Michael Van Canneyt" :
On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
>
>>
>> With your extended "forward type resolution" this would no longer be
>> possible.
>> Theoretically it probably can, but multiple passes w
On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
With your extended "forward type resolution" this would no longer be possible.
Theoretically it probably can, but multiple passes would be needed.
This would aversely affect the compiler speed.
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
> Maybe some form of section folding (Type A ... Type B -> Type A, B) can be
> done.
Oops, I read over that :)
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
>
> With your extended "forward type resolution" this would no longer be possible.
> Theoretically it probably can, but multiple passes would be needed.
> This would aversely affect the compiler speed.
Note that the example shows consecutive typ
On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 09:46:52 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>[...]
> With your extended "forward type resolution" this would no longer be possible.
> Theoretically it probably can, but multiple passes would be needed.
> This would aversely affect the compiler speed.
True for such an ext
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Sandro Cumerlato wrote:
Hello,
please take a look at this small example:
--
program types;
type
PMyTypeA = ^MyTypeA;
PMyTypeB = ^MyTypeB;
type
MyTypeA = record
foo: integer;
bar: integer;
end;
type
MyTypeB = record
Hello,
please take a look at this small example:
--
program types;
type
PMyTypeA = ^MyTypeA;
PMyTypeB = ^MyTypeB;
type
MyTypeA = record
foo: integer;
bar: integer;
end;
type
MyTypeB = record
foo: string;
bar: string;
end;
