On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:59:40 +0100
Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[...]
> >> Unless it's already signalled, then it should run right through.
>
> It was changed in 2.2.0:
> http://wiki.freepascal.org/User_Changes_2.2.0#RTLEvent_persistence
Thanks.
Michael, can you add that hint to the d
On 04 Dec 2008, at 11:36, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Zitat von Vinzent Höfler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:41:12 +0100
Vinzent Höfler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I understand RTLEventWaitFor correct, then it waits until another
thread calls RTLeventSet
In our previous episode, Mattias G?rtner said:
> Yes, that works under Linux. But the documentation does not mention it, so I'm
> not sure if this works under all platforms.
> Maybe some other OS users can try if the following code runs through:
Uses cthreads;
> var
> e: PRTLEvent;
> begin
>
Zitat von Vinzent Höfler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:41:12 +0100
> > Vinzent Höfler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > If I understand RTLEventWaitFor correct, then it waits until another
> > thread calls RTLeventSetEvent.
>
> Unless it's already sig
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:41:12 +0100
Vinzent Höfler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I understand RTLEventWaitFor correct, then it waits until another
thread calls RTLeventSetEvent.
Unless it's already signalled, then it should run right through.
So I must check *before* c
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:41:55 +
Martin Friebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mattias Gärtner wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm looking for a high performance 'wait-for'.
> >
> > The situation:
> > There are m threads working in parallel on n chunks of work (n>=m).
> > The n chunks are indexed 0..n-1
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:41:12 +0100
Vinzent Höfler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mattias Gärtner wrote:
>
> > The situation:
> > There are m threads working in parallel on n chunks of work (n>=m).
> > The n chunks are indexed 0..n-1.
> > Sometimes one thread needs the result of some of the lower in
Mattias Gärtner wrote:
The situation:
There are m threads working in parallel on n chunks of work (n>=m).
The n chunks are indexed 0..n-1.
Sometimes one thread needs the result of some of the lower indexed chunks. For
example the chunk number 5 needs chunks 0..2.
So I have a function WaitForInde
Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for a high performance 'wait-for'.
The situation:
There are m threads working in parallel on n chunks of work (n>=m).
The n chunks are indexed 0..n-1.
Sometimes one thread needs the result of some of the lower indexed chunks. For
example the chunk numb
Hi all,
I'm looking for a high performance 'wait-for'.
The situation:
There are m threads working in parallel on n chunks of work (n>=m).
The n chunks are indexed 0..n-1.
Sometimes one thread needs the result of some of the lower indexed chunks. For
example the chunk number 5 needs chunks 0..2.
S
10 matches
Mail list logo
