Jeff Wormsley wrote:
> One of the reasons I like Pascal
> is that you do usually have to spell out what you are doing. It makes
> reading the code months or years later, or reading someone else's code
> much easier.
That is why I never use "with".
For me "with" severely brakes the paradigm you
Jeff Wormsley pisze:
Michael Schnell wrote:
Again something inspired by Delphi-Prism ?
( http://prismwiki.codegear.com/en/Lambda_Expressions )
Wow, talk about unreadable code...
why all vote about something, that wasn't proposed ?
--
Darek
___
Jeff Wormsley wrote:
> Wow, talk about unreadable code...
>
In fact I did not ever try to understand this. I just happened to know
about Lambda in Prism and wanted to let the forum share that.
> I'm all for saving typing, but not at the expense of readability.
Agreed.
> This
> reminds me of
ik pisze:
Pascal have something close to lambda, and it's nested
functions/procedures
The original idea of lambda is to have sub process that takes
parameters and simple tasks.
You don't understand me. I know sub process, this is nice feature of
pascal, but i talk about something different.
2009/10/20 Jeff Wormsley :
>>
>> ( http://prismwiki.codegear.com/en/Lambda_Expressions )
>
> Wow, talk about unreadable code...
+1
That's all I can say.
--
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
http://opensoft.h
Marco van de Voort schreef:
(hmm, if I would name one feature I hate about C, that would be that if (x=y)
goes unnoticed while legal. At least the ? operator doesn't bite you if you
don't use it)
Off topic.
Vincent
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-dev
In our previous episode, Jeff Wormsley said:
> > ( http://prismwiki.codegear.com/en/Lambda_Expressions )
> Wow, talk about unreadable code...
>
> I'm all for saving typing, but not at the expense of readability. This
> reminds me of C's oddball ? operator.
(hmm, if I would name one feature I
Pascal have something close to lambda, and it's nested functions/procedures
The original idea of lambda is to have sub process that takes parameters and
simple tasks.
For example (in Ruby):
def action(base)
expo = lambda { |by_num| base ** by_num}
x = something
a = expo(x)
end
I can
Michael Schnell wrote:
Again something inspired by Delphi-Prism ?
( http://prismwiki.codegear.com/en/Lambda_Expressions )
Wow, talk about unreadable code...
I'm all for saving typing, but not at the expense of readability. This
reminds me of C's oddball ? operator. One of the reasons I lik
Michael Schnell pisze:
Again something inspired by Delphi-Prism ?
( http://prismwiki.codegear.com/en/Lambda_Expressions )
No at all, I don't even see this before. I thing long about this. But
lately I see this in C++ (strange) and Lisp (beautiful)
In Prism have You:
c -> c.Name = 'Smith'
Again something inspired by Delphi-Prism ?
( http://prismwiki.codegear.com/en/Lambda_Expressions )
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Hi
Based on discussion about "for in" I want to suggest my proposition.
When we investigate some code, sometimes we found pattern:
Pattern 1:
/ begin
startfun;
try
...
finally
stopfun;
end;
/ end;
Pattern 2:
for i:= startfun to stopfun do begin
end;
Pattern 3
12 matches
Mail list logo
