On 2013-03-06 13:13, Alexander Klenin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 03/05/2013 05:17 PM, Alexander Klenin wrote:
1) Make sure "is" and "as" work with generic types -- maybe they already
are?
"is" the generic type and/or "is" a certain specialization ?
Yes,
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 03/05/2013 05:17 PM, Alexander Klenin wrote:
>>
>> 1) Make sure "is" and "as" work with generic types -- maybe they already
>> are?
>
> "is" the generic type and/or "is" a certain specialization ?
Yes, and also generic parameters.
proce
On 03/05/2013 05:17 PM, Alexander Klenin wrote:
1) Make sure "is" and "as" work with generic types -- maybe they
already are?
"is" the generic type and/or "is" a certain specialization ?
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:13 PM, ListMember wrote:
> This brings me to wonder if it would be possible to pass some constant (or
> set of constants, or something similar) to generic routine such that
> this/these option(s) would be treated as compiles options within the
> implementation of the gene
On 2013-03-05 12:37, Sven Barth wrote:
Thanks, I try my best :)
I know you do.
And, since generics has also been mentioned in this thread, here is
something I'd like to table/mention (or, rather, use you as a sounding
board, if I may).
Sometimes writing generic routines that are truly gene
