Re: [fpc-devel] Porting FPC to Support OpenMoko

2009-03-23 Thread Marc Weustink
Henry Vermaak wrote: 2009/3/21 ik : Hello All, Sorry for the late response. I will try the fpc port of Turbo Control soon. The file command gives me the following information: /bin/busybox: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped I do

Re: [fpc-devel] Porting FPC to Support OpenMoko

2009-03-23 Thread Paul Breneman
Ido, I've tested your Hello World example and it returns to me the following error message: ./ppcarm hello.pas Illegal instruction The two OM distro I tested using EABI On 14 Dec 2008 on the fpc-devel maillist Florian Klaempfl wrote: ** Yes. I uploaded a starting eabi compiler t

Re: [fpc-devel] Porting FPC to Support OpenMoko

2009-03-22 Thread ik
Hello Paul, I've tested your Hello World example and it returns to me the following error message: ./ppcarm hello.pas Illegal instruction The two OM distro I tested using EABI Ido On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Paul Breneman wrote: > Hello Ido, > > > I have a real (not emulator) opnmoko P

Re: [fpc-devel] Porting FPC to Support OpenMoko

2009-03-21 Thread Henry Vermaak
2009/3/21 ik : > Hello All, > > Sorry for the late response. > I will try the fpc port of Turbo Control soon. > > The file command gives me the following information: > /bin/busybox: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically > linked (uses shared libs), stripped > > I do not hav

Re: [fpc-devel] Porting FPC to Support OpenMoko

2009-03-21 Thread ik
Hello All, Sorry for the late response. I will try the fpc port of Turbo Control soon. The file command gives me the following information: /bin/busybox: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped I do not have experience with non x86 archit

Re: [fpc-devel] Porting FPC to Support OpenMoko

2009-03-21 Thread Henry Vermaak
2009/3/21 Paul Breneman : > Henry, > > I've started developing some embedded ARM products (for city tornado warning > sirens) using FreePascal.  Thankfully FPC 2.2.2 ARM-Linux works just fine on > the board I'm using. > > But I'd like to understand more about the different options that FPC > suppor

Re: [fpc-devel] Porting FPC to Support OpenMoko

2009-03-21 Thread Paul Breneman
Henry, I have a real (not emulator) opnmoko PDA/cell phone. The main distro for it uses armv4tl. Is there a need to add extra support for OM, or will FPC (what version) will support it ? If there is a support, are there any known issues with it ? do you know if it uses eabi or oabi? last tim

Re: [fpc-devel] Porting FPC to Support OpenMoko

2009-03-21 Thread Henry Vermaak
2009/3/21 ik : > Hello, > > I have a real (not emulator) opnmoko PDA/cell phone.  The main distro for it > uses armv4tl. > Is there a need to add extra support for OM, or will FPC (what version) will > support it ? If there is a support, are there any known issues with it ? do you know if it uses

Re: [fpc-devel] Porting FPC to Support OpenMoko

2009-03-21 Thread Paul Breneman
Hello Ido, I have a real (not emulator) opnmoko PDA/cell phone. The main distro for it uses armv4tl. Is there a need to add extra support for OM, or will FPC (what version) will support it ? If there is a support, are there any known issues with it ? If there is work needed to be done, can you

[fpc-devel] Porting FPC to Support OpenMoko

2009-03-21 Thread ik
Hello, I have a real (not emulator) opnmoko PDA/cell phone. The main distro for it uses armv4tl. Is there a need to add extra support for OM, or will FPC (what version) will support it ? If there is a support, are there any known issues with it ? If there is work needed to be done, can you pleas