Alain Michaud wrote:
Vinzent Höfler wrote:
Alain Michaud wrote:
Hi,
Not exactly related to this thread, but worth mentioning:
Some time ago I was interested in (numerical) computing some
Bessel function to the highest precision!
I looked at MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, FP87, 3D-so
Vinzent Höfler wrote:
Alain Michaud wrote:
Hi,
Not exactly related to this thread, but worth mentioning:
Some time ago I was interested in (numerical) computing some Bessel
function to the highest precision!
I looked at MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, FP87, 3D-something
etc... And
Alain Michaud wrote:
Hi,
Not exactly related to this thread, but worth mentioning:
Some time ago I was interested in (numerical) computing some Bessel
function to the highest precision!
I looked at MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, FP87, 3D-something etc...
And all that jazz...
It
Hi,
Not exactly related to this thread, but worth mentioning:
Some time ago I was interested in (numerical) computing some Bessel
function to the highest precision!
I looked at MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, FP87, 3D-something etc...
And all that jazz...
It turns out that only t
Florian Klaempfl pisze:
Dariusz Mazur schrieb:
Florian Klaempfl pisze:
Dariusz Mazur schrieb:
Jonas Maebe pisze:
Of course tSSEVector should be declared in System unit.
Then any one can use SSE intentionally
Why can't you now? It's not lik
Dariusz Mazur schrieb:
> Florian Klaempfl pisze:
>> Dariusz Mazur schrieb:
>>
>>> Jonas Maebe pisze:
>>>
> Of course tSSEVector should be declared in System unit.
> Then any one can use SSE intentionally
>
Why can't you now? It's not like multiplication has any othe
Florian Klaempfl pisze:
Dariusz Mazur schrieb:
Jonas Maebe pisze:
Of course tSSEVector should be declared in System unit.
Then any one can use SSE intentionally
Why can't you now? It's not like multiplication has any other meaning
for arrays. And declaring "magic compiler typ
Dariusz Mazur schrieb:
> Jonas Maebe pisze:
>>>
>>>
>>> Of course tSSEVector should be declared in System unit.
>>> Then any one can use SSE intentionally
>>
>> Why can't you now? It's not like multiplication has any other meaning
>> for arrays. And declaring "magic compiler types" in the system u
Jonas Maebe pisze:
Of course tSSEVector should be declared in System unit.
Then any one can use SSE intentionally
Why can't you now? It's not like multiplication has any other meaning
for arrays. And declaring "magic compiler types" in the system unit is
something that should be avoided as
Mattias Gaertner pisze:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:25:16 +0100
darekm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
Are in FPC some instruction set contains streaming SIMD (SSE) like
in GCC:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.2/gcc/X86-Built_002din-Functions.html
or in Microsoft Visual
http://msdn.mi
On 29 Nov 2008, at 18:15, Dariusz Mazur wrote:
Florian Klaempfl pisze:
function f : double;
var
d1,d2,d3 : array[0..1] of double;
begin
d1:=d2*d3;
end;
I would expect some thing like this
type
tSSEvector= packed record of
a,b : double;
end;
{ or }
tSSEvector
Florian Klaempfl pisze:
Jonas Maebe schrieb:
On 29 Nov 2008, at 11:11, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
You can tell FPC to do the SSE code for you:
-Cf Select fpu instruction set to use, see fpc -i for
possible values
That only applies to (scalar) FPU operations at
Jonas Maebe schrieb:
>
> On 29 Nov 2008, at 11:11, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
>
>> You can tell FPC to do the SSE code for you:
>>
>> -Cf Select fpu instruction set to use, see fpc -i for
>> possible values
>
> That only applies to (scalar) FPU operations at this time. It won't d
On 29 Nov 2008, at 11:11, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
You can tell FPC to do the SSE code for you:
-Cf Select fpu instruction set to use, see fpc -i for
possible values
That only applies to (scalar) FPU operations at this time. It won't do
any (auto or other) vectorisation.
You can tell FPC to do the SSE code for you:
-Cf Select fpu instruction set to use, see fpc -i for
possible values
And in fpc - i I see:
Supported CPU instruction sets:
386
PENTIUM
PENTIUM2
PENTIUM3
PENTIUM4
PENTIUMM
Supported FPU instruction sets:
X87
SSE
SSE2
SSE
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:25:16 +0100
darekm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Are in FPC some instruction set contains streaming SIMD (SSE) like
> in GCC:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.2/gcc/X86-Built_002din-Functions.html
>
> or in Microsoft Visual
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.co
Hi
Are in FPC some instruction set contains streaming SIMD (SSE) like in
GCC:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.2/gcc/X86-Built_002din-Functions.html
or in Microsoft Visual
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/kcwz153a(VS.80).aspx
--
Darek
___
17 matches
Mail list logo
