Hi all,
So some time has passed, do you think we could reach an agreement on the
GSoC collaboration?
We have to submit our application by the end of this month but I would like
to set up a tentative schedule beforehand.
Can we work on this together?
Vittorio
Sent from my iPad Mini
On
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.bewrote:
On 10 Feb 2013, at 22:32, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
What about (d) is this project feasible? If not, is it can you split in
(parallel) sub projects so that more people can tackle it?
I really don't know whether it
On 10.02.2013 23:04, Marco van de Voort wrote:
I never spent more than an evening on the test though, since I rather get
rid of all the mingw parts instead (think fpmake here)
This might be the best. Let's see that fpmake can handle all that and
then get rid of the remaining tool
On 11 Feb 2013, at 09:45, Sven Barth wrote:
On 10.02.2013 23:04, Marco van de Voort wrote:
I never spent more than an evening on the test though, since I rather get
rid of all the mingw parts instead (think fpmake here)
This might be the best. Let's see that fpmake can handle all that and
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
I never spent more than an evening on the test though, since I rather get
rid of all the mingw parts instead (think fpmake here)
This might be the best. Let's see that fpmake can handle all that and then
get rid of the remaining tool
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
Then we would still have the problem of the outdated tools. Maybe we could
write Pascal based substitutes for them that only need to handle the cases
of compiler/rtl compilation...
The only problem I'm aware of is cp copying the read-only
Am 11.02.2013 11:47, schrieb Marco van de Voort:
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
Then we would still have the problem of the outdated tools. Maybe we could
write Pascal based substitutes for them that only need to handle the cases of
compiler/rtl compilation...
The only problem
On Mon, February 11, 2013 10:04, Sven Barth wrote:
On 11.02.2013 09:55, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 11 Feb 2013, at 09:45, Sven Barth wrote:
On 10.02.2013 23:04, Marco van de Voort wrote:
I never spent more than an evening on the test though, since I rather
get
rid of all the mingw parts instead
Indeed, a fpc-js code generator would have a rather limited use. A
LLVM backend instead could be use on many more levels, and for example
could improve (or replace) the compilation process on iOS.
Plus I would like that this collaboration would be about something
that could be useful for many
Am 10.02.2013 15:23, schrieb Vittorio Giovara:
Indeed, a fpc-js code generator would have a rather limited use. A
LLVM backend instead could be use on many more levels, and for example
could improve (or replace) the compilation process on iOS.
Improve in which regard? Experience showed that
Am 10.02.2013 15:23, schrieb Vittorio Giovara:
Indeed, a fpc-js code generator would have a rather limited use. A
LLVM backend instead could be use on many more levels, and for example
Not to mention that I estimate that full llvm support with debugging and
extending llvm to support
On 10/feb/2013, at 15:58, Florian Klaempfl flor...@freepascal.org wrote:
Am 10.02.2013 15:23, schrieb Vittorio Giovara:
Indeed, a fpc-js code generator would have a rather limited use. A
LLVM backend instead could be use on many more levels, and for example
could improve (or replace) the
On 10 Feb 2013, at 20:12, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
The iOS experience could be improved in many ways, for example in
Xcode you cannot set a breakpoint and when you do so with gdb all you
get is an assembly viewer
I don't remember ever hearing about this or seeing a bug report about this.
Am 10.02.2013 20:12, schrieb Vittorio Giovara:
Well the existence of external tools is what has allowed technology
to foster and advance,
In a perfect world, with unlimited cpu resources, yes.
eg have some common grounds and entry
points... Your (limited) example is not exactly perfect,
In our previous episode, Vittorio Giovara said:
Well the existence of external tools is what has allowed technology to
foster and advance, eg have some common grounds and entry points...
Your (limited) example is not exactly perfect, the tools that fpc
bundle on windows are often outdated and
On 10 Feb 2013, at 21:07, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Note though that one of the reasons why FPC tools are old is because they
are the most up to date mingw versions. Before they abandonned the tools
we were using, and set up everything in MSYS.
At least the mingw binutils are still
On 10.02.2013 21:29, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 10 Feb 2013, at 21:07, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Note though that one of the reasons why FPC tools are old is because they
are the most up to date mingw versions. Before they abandonned the tools
we were using, and set up everything in MSYS.
At
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:08:29PM +0100, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
Note though that one of the reasons why FPC tools are old is because they
are the most up to date mingw versions. Before they abandonned the tools
we were using, and set up
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.bewrote:
On 10 Feb 2013, at 20:12, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
The iOS experience could be improved in many ways, for example in
Xcode you cannot set a breakpoint and when you do so with gdb all you
get is an assembly viewer
In our previous episode, Henry Vermaak said:
Sven already replied, but roughly in the coreutils package. (the former
findutils and diffutils iirc)
Sorry if this is a daft question, but can't you use the msys coreutils?
Or do they have some limitation?
IIRC they were less adapted to
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:04:59PM +0100, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Henry Vermaak said:
Sven already replied, but roughly in the coreutils package. (the former
findutils and diffutils iirc)
Sorry if this is a daft question, but can't you use the msys
Hi all,
I'm one of the developer of Hedgewars, an open source video game all
written with FreePascal. Please see the full site at
http://www.hedgewars.org/
One of the Hedgewars project is to make a WebGL/Javascript version of the
game so that it can run in a browser. To do that we are using a
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
Hi all,
I'm one of the developer of Hedgewars, an open source video game all written
with FreePascal. Please see the full site at
http://www.hedgewars.org/
One of the Hedgewars project is to make a WebGL/Javascript version of the game
so that it
Am 09.02.2013 03:13, schrieb Vittorio Giovara:
To do that we are using a tool
named 'emscripten' which takes LLVM bytecode and generates Javascript,
without affecting performance too much. Yes, we had to write a horribly
hacked converter that took the small subset of Pascal used by Hedgewars
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 09.02.2013 03:13, schrieb Vittorio Giovara:
To do that we are using a tool
named 'emscripten' which takes LLVM bytecode and generates Javascript,
without affecting performance too much. Yes, we had to write a horribly
hacked converter that took
25 matches
Mail list logo
