On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If Graeme Geldenhuys finds the time, he'll code a native
> Object Pascal replacement for the clocale unit. That
> replacement could go in SysUtils.
> (that is, he said he'd give it a try)
And yes, it's still on my
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
> If Graeme Geldenhuys finds the time, he'll code a native
> Object Pascal replacement for the clocale unit. That
> replacement could go in SysUtils.
> (that is, he said he'd give it a try)
(IMHO that should be optional too, since contrary to ot
In our previous episode, Paul Ishenin said:
> Please explain why clocale must be included as a separate unit to the
> project?
> Why not include it into unix sysutils?
It uses the libc library. Same reason as cthreads, cwstring etc. It also
allows the user to override basic locale initialization
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Paul Ishenin wrote:
> Hello, FPC developers' list
>
> Please explain why clocale must be included as a separate unit to the project?
> Why not include it into unix sysutils?
Because we don't want a FPC binary to depend on Libc by default.
All LibC dependencies are optional
Hello, FPC developers' list
Please explain why clocale must be included as a separate unit to the
project?
Why not include it into unix sysutils?
Can we freely use it in lazarus or we can get problems?
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
___
fpc-devel mailli
