Am 15.04.2011 11:39, schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 14.04.2011 22:29, schrieb Florian Klämpfl:
Am 13.04.2011 12:11, schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 12.04.2011 21:41, schrieb Sven Barth:
The latter change is not yet commited (I will do that tomorrow), but
the
implementation of the flag and the removing of
Am 16.04.2011 15:27, schrieb Florian Klämpfl:
Am 15.04.2011 11:39, schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 14.04.2011 22:29, schrieb Florian Klämpfl:
Am 13.04.2011 12:11, schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 12.04.2011 21:41, schrieb Sven Barth:
The latter change is not yet commited (I will do that tomorrow), but
the
On 16.04.2011 15:55, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 16.04.2011 15:27, schrieb Florian Klämpfl:
Am 15.04.2011 11:39, schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 14.04.2011 22:29, schrieb Florian Klämpfl:
Am 13.04.2011 12:11, schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 12.04.2011 21:41, schrieb Sven Barth:
The latter change is not yet
Am 14.04.2011 22:29, schrieb Florian Klämpfl:
Am 13.04.2011 12:11, schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 12.04.2011 21:41, schrieb Sven Barth:
The latter change is not yet commited (I will do that tomorrow), but the
implementation of the flag and the removing of current_syssym are
already commited.
Done.
Am 13.04.2011 12:11, schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 12.04.2011 21:41, schrieb Sven Barth:
The latter change is not yet commited (I will do that tomorrow), but the
implementation of the flag and the removing of current_syssym are
already commited.
Done.
Looks good to me now. So imo it can be
Am 12.04.2011 21:41, schrieb Sven Barth:
The latter change is not yet commited (I will do that tomorrow), but the
implementation of the flag and the removing of current_syssym are
already commited.
Done.
Regards,
Sven
___
fpc-devel maillist -
On 11.04.2011 01:33, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 10 Apr 2011, at 21:49, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 08.04.2011 09:07, schrieb Jonas Maebe:
On 08 Apr 2011, at 08:58, Sven Barth wrote:
Maybe you can do it in pass_1 instead, and add another boolean field
to ttypenode similar to allowed (such as
06.04.2011 2:20, Sven Barth пишет:
On 05.04.2011 17:34, Sven Barth wrote:
- Is ibsymtableoptions needed? Couldn't be the value just be written to
the ppu without a new entry?
It didn't work the first time I added that, but it might be because of
other errors I had at that time. I'll recheck
Am 06.04.2011 13:35, schrieb Florian Klaempfl:
Am 05.04.2011 17:34, schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 05.04.2011 17:06, schrieb Florian Klaempfl:
Am 05.04.2011 04:27, schrieb Paul Ishenin:
I think your branch should be reviewed either by Florian
I did a quick review and found nothing important, only
Am 05.04.2011 04:27, schrieb Paul Ishenin:
We probably can extend these tricks for other types and may be speedup
the compiler.
I think your branch should be reviewed either by Florian or by Jonas
before the merge.
I can review the coding style etc. but not if the semantics or syntax of
the
05.04.2011 14:26, Florian Klaempfl пишет:
Am 05.04.2011 04:27, schrieb Paul Ishenin:
We probably can extend these tricks for other types and may be speedup
the compiler.
I think your branch should be reviewed either by Florian or by Jonas
before the merge.
I can review the coding style etc.
Am 05.04.2011 10:09, schrieb Paul Ishenin:
05.04.2011 14:26, Florian Klaempfl пишет:
Am 05.04.2011 04:27, schrieb Paul Ishenin:
We probably can extend these tricks for other types and may be speedup
the compiler.
I think your branch should be reviewed either by Florian or by Jonas
before
05.04.2011 16:11, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Yes, but but they need to be reviewed as well, no?
If they all were tested with delphi xe then no.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Am 05.04.2011 10:19, schrieb Paul Ishenin:
05.04.2011 16:11, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Yes, but but they need to be reviewed as well, no?
If they all were tested with delphi xe then no.
I developed them in Delphi XE first before I copied them into my branch.
(the only problem with my
Am 05.04.2011 04:27, schrieb Paul Ishenin:
05.04.2011 3:51, Sven Barth wrote:
Both class helpers and record helpers are implemented and work as
Delphi compatible as reasonably possible.
Congratulations.
Thank you.
Some notes regarding the tests:
* three record helper tests (trhlp*)
Am 05.04.2011 11:17, schrieb Sven Barth:
Some notes regarding the tests:
* three record helper tests (trhlp*) fail, because nested types are not
supported by (advanced) records (two should fail nevertheless, because
they try to access (strict) private helpers, the third should succeed)
Nested
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:17:48 +0200, Sven Barth
pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 05.04.2011 04:27, schrieb Paul Ishenin:
05.04.2011 3:51, Sven Barth wrote:
Both class helpers and record helpers are implemented and work
as
Delphi compatible as reasonably possible.
Congratulations.
Am 05.04.2011 11:42, schrieb dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl:
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:17:48 +0200, Sven Barth
pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 05.04.2011 04:27, schrieb Paul Ishenin:
05.04.2011 3:51, Sven Barth wrote:
Both class helpers and record helpers are implemented and work as
Delphi
Am 05.04.2011 04:27, schrieb Paul Ishenin:
I think your branch should be reviewed either by Florian
I did a quick review and found nothing important, only a few remarks:
- current_syssym: is it really needed? Can't the type checking be done
during the type check pass? If it's needed, it
Am 05.04.2011 17:06, schrieb Florian Klaempfl:
Am 05.04.2011 04:27, schrieb Paul Ishenin:
I think your branch should be reviewed either by Florian
I did a quick review and found nothing important, only a few remarks:
- current_syssym: is it really needed? Can't the type checking be done
On 05.04.2011 17:34, Sven Barth wrote:
- Is ibsymtableoptions needed? Couldn't be the value just be written to
the ppu without a new entry?
It didn't work the first time I added that, but it might be because of
other errors I had at that time. I'll recheck that to be sure.
I now remember why
05.04.2011 3:51, Sven Barth wrote:
Both class helpers and record helpers are implemented and work as
Delphi compatible as reasonably possible.
Congratulations.
Some notes regarding the tests:
* three record helper tests (trhlp*) fail, because nested types are not
supported by (advanced)
22 matches
Mail list logo