On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:01:53 -0700
L505 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm all for it. The question is: base or extra. Or even FCL.
fpnet package. The FCL is only basic stuff, some extended RTL. IMHO the
fpimage,db and xml shall also be moved to fpimage, fpdb and fpxml
packages.
Why
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On 2/3/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Packages are not necessarily class based, are often simple imports of
libraries and so on; not the place for VCL/CLX counterparts.
I don't want to get into the fp discussion,
I was wondering if I could put lNet library (for those who don't know,
go to http://members.chello.sk/ales ) into packages.
What do you think?
Ales
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Ales Katona wrote:
I was wondering if I could put lNet library (for those who don't know, go to
http://members.chello.sk/ales ) into packages.
I'm all for it. The question is: base or extra. Or even FCL.
Michael.
___
fpc-devel
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Ales Katona wrote:
I was wondering if I could put lNet library (for those who don't know,
go to
http://members.chello.sk/ales ) into packages.
I'm all for it. The question is: base or extra. Or even FCL.
fpnet package. The FCL is only basic stuff, some extended RTL.
I'm all for it. The question is: base or extra. Or even FCL.
fpnet package. The FCL is only basic stuff, some extended RTL. IMHO the
fpimage,db and xml shall also be moved to fpimage, fpdb and fpxml
packages.
Why prefix everything with fp ?
To have a common prefix that shows it is part of
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Peter Vreman wrote:
I'm all for it. The question is: base or extra. Or even FCL.
fpnet package. The FCL is only basic stuff, some extended RTL. IMHO the
fpimage,db and xml shall also be moved to fpimage, fpdb and fpxml
packages.
Why prefix everything with fp ?
I'll be honest to say that I don't care much if it's in FCL or
Packages/Bare or Extra but the fp is not going to happen.
Names are already done and they are used, I can't rename the API.
Ales
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
On 2/3/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Packages are not necessarily class based, are often simple imports of
libraries and so on; not the place for VCL/CLX counterparts.
I don't want to get into the fp discussion, but I think that many
things on FCL are not the counter-part of
I'm all for it. The question is: base or extra. Or even FCL.
fpnet package. The FCL is only basic stuff, some extended RTL. IMHO the
fpimage,db and xml shall also be moved to fpimage, fpdb and fpxml
packages.
Why prefix everything with fp ?
I think it will be more obvious as to why it is
10 matches
Mail list logo
