Re: [fpc-devel] modernizing pascal discussions

2005-06-03 Thread listmember
Florian Klaempfl wrote: If you want to modernize the language you can take the current fpc code and extend it yourself. If the extension is clear and we agree on it it can eventually be put in the main fpc release. Discussions are useful. Discussions without proper basics are useless. If you

Re: [fpc-devel] modernizing pascal discussions

2005-06-03 Thread Florian Klaempfl
listmember wrote: >> If you want to modernize the language you can take the current fpc >> code and extend it yourself. If the extension is clear and we agree on >> it it can eventually be put in the main fpc release. > > > Discussions are useful. Discussions without proper basics are useless.

Re: [fpc-devel] modernizing pascal discussions

2005-06-02 Thread listmember
If you want to modernize the language you can take the current fpc code and extend it yourself. If the extension is clear and we agree on it it can eventually be put in the main fpc release. Discussions are useful. Before one starts coding away, a consensus would be nice to have. I would not

[fpc-devel] modernizing pascal discussions

2005-06-02 Thread Peter Vreman
I think we should put these kind of threads to an end. We get several different request which conflict or need a lot of time: - Packages - Better optimizer - Better smartlinking (internal linker) to reduce executable size - Easier cross platform (internal linker/assemblers) - Faster (C++ like) e