On 25.01.2013 23:57, Alexander Klenin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
One could also do an alternative (though currently not with arrays, but with
type helper support even that would be possible...):
Yes, this is certainly the most
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Paul Ishenin paul.ishe...@gmail.com wrote:
26.01.13, 6:57, Alexander Klenin пишет:
Why to invent a new solution if Delphi already have one:
http://docs.embarcadero.com/products/rad_studio/delphiAndcpp2009/HelpUpdate2/EN/html/devcommon/anonymousmethods_xml.html
On 26.01.2013 15:52, Alexander Klenin wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Paul Ishenin paul.ishe...@gmail.com wrote:
26.01.13, 6:57, Alexander Klenin пишет:
Why to invent a new solution if Delphi already have one:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 26.01.2013 15:52, Alexander Klenin wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Paul Ishenin paul.ishe...@gmail.com
wrote:
26.01.13, 6:57, Alexander Klenin пишет:
Why to invent a new solution if Delphi already
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 1:59 AM, kyan alfasud...@gmail.com wrote:
I assume this is because anonymous functions are not plain methods. Thus
they are not compatible with TMethod (the type behind procedure/function of
object). They are instead based on a different (internal) type.
Please take a
On 26.01.2013 16:34, Alexander Klenin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 25.01.2013 23:57, Alexander Klenin wrote:
You have also proposed lambda-expressions:
map.Iterate(lambda TFPGMapLongInt.TIteratorProc(aKey, aData) as
Writeln(aKey, '
In our previous episode, Alexander Klenin said:
Please take a look at this:
http://blog.barrkel.com/2010/01/using-anonymous-methods-in-method.html
While this article confirms my understainding of them Delphi implementation,
it does not offer a solution.
The solution must come at the
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 26.01.2013 16:34, Alexander Klenin wrote:
Ok, then let's take just one step back:
SomeProc(lambda TProc1 as Writeln(aArg));
This way, but problems are solved -- procedure type is specified
independently from
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
One could also do an alternative (though currently not with arrays, but with
type helper support even that would be possible...):
Yes, this is certainly the most interesting alternative. Actually,
anonymous
