Am 30.08.2011 03:06, schrieb Anthony Walter:
Tonight I tried to "make all" from your branch and wasn't able to build.
This is a the output I got:
http://pastebin.com/GQh5XA2w
I am guessing your build requires a working version of your fpc binary
to build itself.
The errors you see are already
Sven,
Tonight I tried to "make all" from your branch and wasn't able to build.
This is a the output I got:
http://pastebin.com/GQh5XA2w
I am guessing your build requires a working version of your fpc binary to
build itself.
Also, I wrote a few of pretty clean test cases in Delphi 2010 Today whe
Wow, Sven, thanks for the reply, and most definitely thanks for working
on FPC. Anything I can do to help I'll do. Last week I sent patches to
fix issues with Lazarus CodeTools and the new generic syntax which
basically caused a lot of problems in the IDE.
I'll be on freenode irc in both #fpc and
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As Paul and Jonas already told you, I'm currently working on improving the
> compilers generic implementation. As you have noticed it currently doesn't
> support generic methods and constraints at all. Also the generic
> implementation
Hi!
As Paul and Jonas already told you, I'm currently working on improving
the compilers generic implementation. As you have noticed it currently
doesn't support generic methods and constraints at all. Also the generic
implementation in mode Delphi isn't working correctly as you've noticed.
I
On 29 Aug 2011, at 16:50, Anthony Walter wrote:
Btw, where would be a good place to follow your progress on
JVm support?
Here :) And also the svn commit log of http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/branches/jvmbackend
, as well as http://wiki.freepascal.org/FPC_JVM and its subpages
(probably e
Thanks Jonas. Btw, where would be a good place to follow your progress on
JVm support?
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On 29 Aug 2011, at 16:23, Anthony Walter wrote:
Paul, thanks for the reply. Did you mean to say that the generics are
actually being improved ... that is that someday you might be able
to say:
procedure TMyNonGenericClass.MyGenericMethod(List: TList);
Or that the random seeming bugs with t
Oh, and FPC generics really need the ability to add constraints ...
e.g. type TObjectList = class TList ... end;
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Paul Ishenin wrote:
> Yes. These are known problems and you would found even more a year ago.
> Sven Barth now trying to fix exising problems and implement missing things.
>
> If you wish to try fix them yourself you need to study how parser part of
> the compile
29.08.2011 21:52, Anthony Walter wrote:
Jump to "So here are some of the problems I've found with fpc
generics" if you don't want to read the backstory.
...
And if someone ever does intent to fix generics in FPC, there are a
whole slew of errors that they already bring into the compiler. I'll
11 matches
Mail list logo
