On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, John Lee said:
This sounds like the best plan if one has several .ppus - as some ppl seem
to have & no source code, that should - but not sure what's involved with
writing the wrapper. Could the whole thing be written in
In our previous episode, John Lee said:
> This sounds like the best plan if one has several .ppus - as some ppl seem
> to have & no source code, that should - but not sure what's involved with
> writing the wrapper. Could the whole thing be written in fpc pascal?
>
> Would it be easy to reuse the
This sounds like the best plan if one has several .ppus - as some ppl seem
to have & no source code, that should - but not sure what's involved with
writing the wrapper. Could the whole thing be written in fpc pascal?
Would it be easy to reuse the wrapper for different .ppus? If so this'd be
usef
Am 26.02.2013 07:33 schrieb "Hans-Peter Diettrich" :
>
> Tomas Hajny schrieb:
>
>>> If you'd disable the check you would not be able to use e.g. a 2.4 unit
>>> with 2.6, because the PPU format is different and thus you'd definitely
>>> (not just perhaps!) get errors when the compiler reads the PPU
Tomas Hajny schrieb:
If you'd disable the check you would not be able to use e.g. a 2.4 unit
with 2.6, because the PPU format is different and thus you'd definitely
(not just perhaps!) get errors when the compiler reads the PPU file.
In other words: _If_ someone is motivated enough for such a t
On 2/25/2013 02:27, silvioprog wrote:
2013/2/21 Florian Klämpfl mailto:flor...@freepascal.org>>
Am 21.02.2013 19:43, schrieb silvioprog:
> Hello,
>
> I generates some PPUs in a version of FPC. I try to use it in other
> version of FPC, but it not compiles.
>
> S
Am 25.02.2013 15:39, schrieb John Lee:
> I'm guessing that you'd need to be pretty au fait with fpc internals &
> the code to do this eg because there's no spec, and no tools to help? J
ppudump.
If I'd lost the source of a unit I need (if the unit isn't too big), I'd
just ppudump the .ppu and wri
On Mon, February 25, 2013 15:39, John Lee wrote:
> I'm guessing that you'd need to be pretty au fait with fpc internals & the
> code to do this eg because there's no spec, and no tools to help? J
One would need to combine the original version of the PPU loader (as
included within the compiler sour
2013/2/25 Sven Barth
> On 25.02.2013 15:19, silvioprog wrote:
>
>> 2013/2/25 DaWorm mailto:daw...@gmail.com>>
>>
>> Is the project one that can use shared libraries? Or does the code
>> require inheritance from the code you want to hide the
>> implementation of?
>>
>> Jeff.
>>
>>
I'm guessing that you'd need to be pretty au fait with fpc internals & the
code to do this eg because there's no spec, and no tools to help? J
>
>
> In other words: _If_ someone is motivated enough for such a task, it would
> be possible to create a convertor from one PPU version to another (and I
On 25.02.2013 15:19, silvioprog wrote:
2013/2/25 DaWorm mailto:daw...@gmail.com>>
Is the project one that can use shared libraries? Or does the code
require inheritance from the code you want to hide the
implementation of?
Jeff.
Is the code for a component that will be commer
2013/2/25 DaWorm
> Is the project one that can use shared libraries? Or does the code
> require inheritance from the code you want to hide the implementation of?
>
> Jeff.
>
Is the code for a component that will be commercial. It will use classes
and inheritance.
--
Silvio Clécio
My public pr
Is the project one that can use shared libraries? Or does the code require
inheritance from the code you want to hide the implementation of?
Jeff.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc
On Mon, February 25, 2013 13:42, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 25.02.2013 13:08, John Lee wrote:
>> This is a major pain to quite a few users - I have some units for which
>> source is lost from v2.4. Surely some of the reasons for the changes in
>> ppu version would _not_ cause a problem with later versi
On 25.02.2013 13:08, John Lee wrote:
This is a major pain to quite a few users - I have some units for which
source is lost from v2.4. Surely some of the reasons for the changes in
ppu version would _not_ cause a problem with later versions if one isn't
using this particular feature?
This is th
This is a major pain to quite a few users - I have some units for which
source is lost from v2.4. Surely some of the reasons for the changes in ppu
version would _not_ cause a problem with later versions if one isn't using
this particular feature?
Maybe someone could generate a (binary?) patch to
2013/2/25 Sven Barth
> Am 25.02.2013 08:27 schrieb "silvioprog" :
> >
> > 2013/2/21 Florian Klämpfl
> >>
> >> Am 21.02.2013 19:43, schrieb silvioprog:
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > I generates some PPUs in a version of FPC. I try to use it in other
> >> > version of FPC, but it not compiles.
> >>
Am 25.02.2013 08:27 schrieb "silvioprog" :
>
> 2013/2/21 Florian Klämpfl
>>
>> Am 21.02.2013 19:43, schrieb silvioprog:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I generates some PPUs in a version of FPC. I try to use it in other
>> > version of FPC, but it not compiles.
>> >
>> > So, can I disable the PPU version ch
2013/2/21 Florian Klämpfl
> Am 21.02.2013 19:43, schrieb silvioprog:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I generates some PPUs in a version of FPC. I try to use it in other
> > version of FPC, but it not compiles.
> >
> > So, can I disable the PPU version checking to I use my PPUs in any
> > versions of FPC?
>
>
2013/2/21 Sven Barth
> On 21.02.2013 19:43, silvioprog wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I generates some PPUs in a version of FPC. I try to use it in other
>> version of FPC, but it not compiles.
>>
>> So, can I disable the PPU version checking to I use my PPUs in any
>> versions of FPC?
>>
>
> No you ca
Am 21.02.2013 19:43, schrieb silvioprog:
> Hello,
>
> I generates some PPUs in a version of FPC. I try to use it in other
> version of FPC, but it not compiles.
>
> So, can I disable the PPU version checking to I use my PPUs in any
> versions of FPC?
It won't help, we don't change the ppu versio
On 21.02.2013 19:43, silvioprog wrote:
Hello,
I generates some PPUs in a version of FPC. I try to use it in other
version of FPC, but it not compiles.
So, can I disable the PPU version checking to I use my PPUs in any
versions of FPC?
No you can't. The PPU version is there for a purpose. We i
22 matches
Mail list logo
