On 22/04/2020 09:33, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 21/04/2020 22:56, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>> What happens in that case, is
>>
>> tclassalias ttypesym contains a reference to toriginalclass' tobjectdef,
>> and that tobjectdef's typesym be to toriginalclass' typesym. And in the
>> unit symtable holding that
Am 21.04.2020 um 10:57 schrieb bla...@blaise.ru:
I have questions/suggestions WRT Jonas' SVN r42342:
https://github.com/graemeg/freepascal/commit/40d31e34116efffa239b6dc94373fcfccedfa646
Yay, a life sign! :D
Regards,
Sven
___
fpc-devel maillist -
On 21/04/2020 22:56, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> What happens in that case, is
>
> tclassalias ttypesym contains a reference to toriginalclass' tobjectdef,
> and that tobjectdef's typesym be to toriginalclass' typesym. And in the
> unit symtable holding that typesym, we will find the vmtdef we need
>
On 21/04/2020 10:57, bla...@blaise.ru wrote:
> I have questions/suggestions WRT Jonas' SVN r42342:
> https://github.com/graemeg/freepascal/commit/40d31e34116efffa239b6dc94373fcfccedfa646
>
>
> 1) Why was `typesym.owner` used instead of `owner`? Beside efficiency,
> this hurts understandability:
