Op vrijdag 12-09-2008 om 15:56 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Mattias
Gärtner:
> Zitat von Joost van der Sluis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Op vrijdag 12-09-2008 om 13:22 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef JoshyFun:
> >
> > > A> Thanks for pointing me to the Lazarus thread about this and the bug
> > > A>
Zitat von Joost van der Sluis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Op vrijdag 12-09-2008 om 13:22 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef JoshyFun:
>
> > A> Thanks for pointing me to the Lazarus thread about this and the bug
> > A> report. Checked them.
> > A> But as I understand there is no solution available at the mom
Op vrijdag 12-09-2008 om 13:22 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef JoshyFun:
> A> Thanks for pointing me to the Lazarus thread about this and the bug
> A> report. Checked them.
> A> But as I understand there is no solution available at the moment for this.
>
> I had partially solved the problem using t
Hello ABorka,
Friday, September 12, 2008, 2:30:35 AM, you wrote:
A> Thanks for pointing me to the Lazarus thread about this and the bug
A> report. Checked them.
A> But as I understand there is no solution available at the moment for this.
I had partially solved the problem using the handler "OnG
Hello ABorka,
Thursday, September 11, 2008, 7:26:50 PM, you wrote:
A> The database field can contain any string with '®' in it for this to happen
A> for example: 'sometext®'
A> It seems that
A> ListBox1.Items.Add(SQL1.FieldByName('MyTableField').AsString);
[...]
A> will only put an empty string i
Hello listmember,
Wednesday, September 10, 2008, 3:55:25 PM, you wrote:
l> Please don't get resented, but this kind of attitued is verging on being
l> offensive..
l> Instead of looking at the issue from POV of "I don't need it" or "It
l> requires more hardware resources", can't you try to evaluat
Hello Graeme,
Wednesday, September 10, 2008, 12:36:17 PM, you wrote:
GG> Remember, Unicode support is much more that simply storing and
GG> displaying text. You have various encodings, RTL or LTR direction etc.
GG> I can't see how a simple type can keep track of all such information
GG> - but th
Hello Florian,
Saturday, August 30, 2008, 5:30:08 PM, you wrote:
>> I'm writting some unicode support functions, they are mostly based in
>> the current WideString format. Is there any important technical
>> difference which could prevent the current code to work as the
>> WideString one ?
FK> Th
