Peter Vreman wrote:
That is impossible. The linker is 'stupid' in that sence. And it also
should not be trying to be smart. Otherwise it will fail in other
situations. Maybe you remember what the (currently disabled) VMT optimizer
did for the LCL. It removed methods that the LCL expected to be th
Micha Nelissen wrote:
Peter Vreman wrote:
That is impossible. The linker is 'stupid' in that sence. And it also
should not be trying to be smart. Otherwise it will fail in other
situations. Maybe you remember what the (currently disabled) VMT
optimizer
did for the LCL. It removed methods that
Marc Weustink wrote:
It isn't really doing much with the internals. I've to admit that
It reads/searches the VMT pointers themselves, right ? Is that supposed
to work in the language ?
Micha
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
On Thursday 19 October 2006 08:31, Marc Weustink wrote:
> The case shows that users can do this. There is no language construct
> that forbids it. So optimizing this with a smart linker may break
> such code.
Yes, it may. So what?
There's hell a lot of code that is generally possible within the
Op Thu, 19 Oct 2006, schreef Micha Nelissen:
> Marc Weustink wrote:
> > It isn't really doing much with the internals. I've to admit that
>
> It reads/searches the VMT pointers themselves, right ? Is that supposed to
> work in the language ?
I don't know, but there should be a way to request
Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
On Thursday 19 October 2006 08:31, Marc Weustink wrote:
The case shows that users can do this. There is no language construct
that forbids it. So optimizing this with a smart linker may break
such code.
Yes, it may. So what?
There's hell a lot of code that is generally
On Thursday 19 October 2006 09:39, Marc Weustink wrote:
> The only thing guaranteed by the language is that if you follow its
> definitions, it will compile.
No. That's syntax. I'm talking about semantics.
Vinzent.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-deve
Peter Vreman wrote:
situations. Maybe you remember what the (currently disabled) VMT optimizer
did for the LCL. It removed methods that the LCL expected to be there.
After some thinking, the VMT optimizer can be enabled, but should not
remove any published methods. Those may be referenced from
I speak in the name of the ZEOS Developers.
We want to contribute to the FPC Project, in the form
that we
deliver a FPC usable Version of the ZEOS DBO.
If you don’t know ZEOS by now, it is a set of
mature database components
usable visual or nonvisual, wich interface to SQLite,
MySQL
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Helmut Hartl wrote:
> I speak in the name of the ZEOS Developers.
>
> We want to contribute to the FPC Project, in the form that we
>
> deliver a FPC usable Version of the ZEOS DBO.
>
>
>
> If you don't know ZEOS by now, it is a set of mature database components
>
> u
From: "Daniël Mantione" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
>
> Does the CmdLine variable in the System unit exist for Delphi/TP/...
> compatibility ?
Delphi compatibility.
By the way, I have a patch ready which turns it into a property, which
prevents some code being pulled in Hello World kind of apps.
> The upshot of all this is that we don't need to include all packages
> in FPC by default, making the maintenance burden smaller for the core
> team. All you would need to do is create one small driver file,
> and the rest will be automated for you.
> The central repository access will also
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Helmut Hartl wrote:
>
> > The upshot of all this is that we don't need to include all packages
> > in FPC by default, making the maintenance burden smaller for the core
> > team. All you would need to do is create one small driver file,
> > and the rest will be automate
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 09:10 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 07:51 +0200, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> > > On Thursday 05 October 2006 22.41, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > > > > > Now I'm thinking about using an interf
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Why would it work faster ? The only thing a unidirectionalquery query gives
you is less memory requirements, because it needs only 2 buffers.
Less copying around of the buffers.
But I did some tests, it's negligible. I don't see any advantage in this
worker-class, or
15 matches
Mail list logo
