While porting some Delphi code i found some differences in the
declarations of COM interfaces.
1) In IEnumFORMATETC.Next(Celt:ULong;Out Rgelt:FormatEtc;Out
pceltFetched:ULong):HResult; Delphi expects pceltFetched to be a PInteger
win32 documentation:
*HRESULT Next( ULONG*/ celt/*,* * FORMA
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
While porting some Delphi code i found some differences in the
declarations of COM interfaces.
1) In IEnumFORMATETC.Next(Celt:ULong;Out Rgelt:FormatEtc;Out
pceltFetched:ULong):HResult; Delphi expects pceltFetched to be a
PInteger
win32 documentation:
*H
Hi All,
I'm looking for a guide (for people that have slow learning curves
like me ;)) regarding understanding generics, and the ability to start
using them.
Thanks,
Ido
--
http://ik.homelinux.org/
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepasca
currently there is some demand for a fast widestring type on windows and i
suspect there will be requirements for more string types in the future.
So i make a proposal for a new syntax that will allow string types to be
created easilly in libraries or user code.
my proposal is a statement like
Op Sun, 4 Feb 2007, schreef peter green:
> my proposal is a statement like
>
> type
> tmystring=string(elementtype,allocator,deallocator,copier,uniquer);
And how should you generate debug information for such a user defined
string?
Daniël___
fpc-
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Daniël
> Mantione
> Sent: 04 February 2007 00:09
> To: FPC developers' list
> Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] strings: a proposeal
>
>
>
>
> Op Sun, 4 Feb 2007, schreef peter green:
>
> > my proposal is a s
On Sunday 04 February 2007 01:01, peter green wrote:
> currently there is some demand for a fast widestring type on windows and i
> suspect there will be requirements for more string types in the future.
During the creation of our project, Technetium (www.technetium.dk), we
designed a string libr
On Sunday 04 February 2007 01.01, peter green wrote:
> currently there is some demand for a fast widestring type on windows and i
> suspect there will be requirements for more string types in the future.
>
> So i make a proposal for a new syntax that will allow string types to be
> created easilly
On Sunday 04 February 2007 01.23, peter green wrote:
> from a low level perspective such a string is just a pointer to an array
> plus some compiler magic just like current ansistrings, debugging tools
> shouldn't need to be aware of the magic any more than they need to be aware
> of it for curren
