Re: [fpc-devel] Release of fpc-2.1.4 aka 2.2.0-beta

2007-05-22 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Joost van der Sluis ha escrit: Hello everybody, I'm happy to announce that release 2.1.4 aka 2.2.0 beta is out. The arm-linux directory is empty. Also, will there be a native arm-linux compiler available? Bye -- Luca ___ fpc-devel maillist

Re: [fpc-devel] Release of fpc-2.1.4 aka 2.2.0-beta

2007-05-22 Thread Bernd Mueller
Joost van der Sluis wrote: Helping us to test version 2.1.4 now, can avoid problems when you finally update your fpc-version to 2.2.0. there seems to be a problem, when the archive bit of a unit source file is reset. I am running on Windows 98 SE and I am testing the ARM-Linux compiler. Other

[fpc-devel] FPCUnit as a separate project from FPC?

2007-05-22 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Hi everybody, Darius Blaszijk, Vincent Snijders and myself had a discussion off the mailing list about the possibility of moving FPCUnit out of FPC as a separate project. I thought it to be important that we get the opinions of others as well. In summary: Darius is all for it. Vincent is agai

Re: [fpc-devel] FPCUnit as a separate project from FPC?

2007-05-22 Thread Joost van der Sluis
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 12:29 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > Darius Blaszijk, Vincent Snijders and myself had a discussion off the > mailing list about the possibility of moving FPCUnit out of FPC as a > separate project. I thought it to be important that we get the > opinions of others as well.

Re: [fpc-devel] FPCUnit as a separate project from FPC?

2007-05-22 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 5/22/07, Joost van der Sluis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is the same for all of the LCL. Clearest example is maybe the DB- components. But it holds for all of the LCL, which depends on the FCL and RTL. The LCL is full of version-checks to avoid problems with different fpc-releases. This

Re: [fpc-devel] FPCUnit as a separate project from FPC?

2007-05-22 Thread vsnijders
- Original Message - From: Joost van der Sluis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 12:55 pm Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] FPCUnit as a separate project from FPC? > On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 12:29 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > > Darius Blaszijk, Vincent Snijders and myself had a di

Re: [fpc-devel] FPCUnit as a separate project from FPC?

2007-05-22 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 22 May 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Darius Blaszijk, Vincent Snijders and myself had a discussion off the > mailing list about the possibility of moving FPCUnit out of FPC as a > separate project. I thought it to be important that we get the > opinions of others a

Re: [fpc-devel] FPCUnit as a separate project from FPC?

2007-05-22 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 5/22/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * As it stands now, FPCUnit is split between two repositories. The FPC > one and the Lazarus one. This make it really hard to submit updates. > The FPC one must be done first otherwise it breaks the Lazarus GUI > TestRunner (or Console

[fpc-devel] unsubscibe

2007-05-22 Thread Søren Ager
___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Re: [fpc-devel] FPCUnit as a separate project from FPC?

2007-05-22 Thread Florian Klaempfl
If it helps, I see no problem to give Dean write access to the FPC repository. I guess the same applies for lazarus. ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Re: [fpc-devel] FPCUnit as a separate project from FPC?

2007-05-22 Thread Dean Zobec
2007/5/22, Graeme Geldenhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi everybody, Darius Blaszijk, Vincent Snijders and myself had a discussion off the mailing list about the possibility of moving FPCUnit out of FPC as a separate project. I thought it to be important that we get the opinions of others as well.

Re: [fpc-devel] FPCUnit as a separate project from FPC?

2007-05-22 Thread Dean Zobec
Graeme Geldenhuys pravi: >> This is not quite correct. The only part which should be in Lazarus >> is the GUI stuff. The console testrunner can perfectly be integrated >> in FPC. (as stated by Vincent) > > I agree about the console testrunner. That should move to FPC. > My argument for submitting

Re: [fpc-devel] FPCUnit as a separate project from FPC?

2007-05-22 Thread Dean Zobec
Florian Klaempfl pravi: > If it helps, I see no problem to give Dean write access to the FPC > repository. I guess the same applies for lazarus. Thank you for the offer. I think it's not necessary for now, I get along very well with MvC's mentorship and like to discuss with the core team every sing

Re: [fpc-devel] FPCUnit as a separate project from FPC?

2007-05-22 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 5/22/07, Dean Zobec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >While the Lazarus updates > have not been applied the GUI TestRunner is broken. This would have > happened again a few weeks ago, but my patch still hasn't been applied > in either project. :-( I'll take a look at them this evening. I can't re

Re: [fpc-devel] FPCUnit as a separate project from FPC?

2007-05-22 Thread Darius Blaszijk
Well, I guess that settles it then. FPCUnit stays where it is! After reading all the comments and remarks from today's thread, I'm also convinced now that FPCUnit can stay in FPC, provided the Lazarus console test runner code is moved to FPC as much as possible (apart from the IDE package).