On Friday 29 February 2008 10.07:29 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> >
> > Ideally from my point of view would be if the resourcestrings are stored
> > in utf-8 if the unit is compiled with -Fcutf8 and decoded by utf8decode
> > for widestring assignment on runtime independent of the system encoding.
>
> Th
Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
On Friday 29 February 2008 10.07:29 Daniël Mantione wrote:
Ideally from my point of view would be if the resourcestrings are stored
in utf-8 if the unit is compiled with -Fcutf8 and decoded by utf8decode
for widestring assignment on runtime indep
On Sunday 02 March 2008 10.22:32 Daniël Mantione wrote:
>
> Regarding code generation, there is a difference between ansistrings and
> resourcestrings, since with a resourcestring load, the compiler must look
> into the resourcestring tables to find the ansistring constant.
>
So it is theoretical p
Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
On Sunday 02 March 2008 10.22:32 Daniël Mantione wrote:
Regarding code generation, there is a difference between ansistrings and
resourcestrings, since with a resourcestring load, the compiler must look
into the resourcestring tables to find the
Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
On Sunday 02 March 2008 14.09:47 Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
On Sunday 02 March 2008 10.22:32 Daniël Mantione wrote:
Regarding code generation, there is a difference between ansistrings and
resourcestring
On Sunday 02 March 2008 14.09:47 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
> > On Sunday 02 March 2008 10.22:32 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> >> Regarding code generation, there is a difference between ansistrings and
> >> resourcestrings, since with a resourcestring load, t
Daniël Mantione schrieb:
>
>
> Op Fri, 29 Feb 2008, schreef Christian Iversen:
>
>> Daniël Mantione wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Op Fri, 29 Feb 2008, schreef Christian Iversen:
>>>
> Instead "unaligned" will simulate an unaligned load with two loads
> and some rotation etc. On the ARM, where every
On Sunday 02 March 2008 15.31:04 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> > Then the only possible way to use resourcestrings independent from the
> > system encoding is to compile all resource units with -Fcutf8 and to
> > write every assignment as "widestringvar:=
> > Utf8Decode(resourceconstant);"?
> > Would th
Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
What did I wrong?
I'am not sure how this could be made working just a remark: -Fcutf8
influences _only_ the interpretation of string constants when converting
them to unicode.
Right. Try to compile the (utf-8 encoded) file without specifying a
Martin Schreiber schrieb:
> On Sunday 02 March 2008 15.31:04 Daniël Mantione wrote:
>>> Then the only possible way to use resourcestrings independent from the
>>> system encoding is to compile all resource units with -Fcutf8 and to
>>> write every assignment as "widestringvar:=
>>> Utf8Decode(resou
On Sunday 02 March 2008 18.43:01 Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Martin Schreiber schrieb:
> > What did I wrong?
>
> I'am not sure how this could be made working just a remark: -Fcutf8
> influences _only_ the interpretation of string constants when converting
> them to unicode.
I thought as much. :-)
__
On Sunday 02 March 2008 18.48:01 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
> >> What did I wrong?
> >
> > I'am not sure how this could be made working just a remark: -Fcutf8
> > influences _only_ the interpretation of string constants when converting
> > them to unicode
Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
On Sunday 02 March 2008 18.48:01 Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
What did I wrong?
I'am not sure how this could be made working just a remark: -Fcutf8
influences _only_ the interpretation of string constants
Martin Schreiber schrieb:
> On Sunday 02 March 2008 18.48:01 Daniël Mantione wrote:
>> Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
What did I wrong?
>>> I'am not sure how this could be made working just a remark: -Fcutf8
>>> influences _only_ the interpretation of string constants when conve
I wonder, do you care also to try BIDI text as well ?
Ido
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Martin Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sunday 02 March 2008 18.48:01 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> > Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
> > >> What did I wrong?
> > >
> > > I'am not sur
On Sunday 02 March 2008 19.31:37 Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Martin Schreiber schrieb:
> > On Sunday 02 March 2008 18.48:01 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> >> Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
> What did I wrong?
> >>>
> >>> I'am not sure how this could be made working just a remark: -Fcutf
On Sunday 02 March 2008 19.22:38 ik wrote:
> I wonder, do you care also to try BIDI text as well ?
>
> Ido
>
No, BIDI is out of scope of MSEgui up to now, supporting all European
languages without a headache is a must.
Martin
___
fpc-devel maillist -
Hi
I 'm about to file a bug report and would like to have a confirmation.
The compiler conplains( see the code below ) :
"Fatal: Syntax error, ")" expected but "(" found"
It compiles under Delphi ( D7 ). I tried with "mode delphi" and "mode
objfpc" and still got the
same syntax error ( WinXP fpc
Hi,
Just wanted to call attention that I created a wiki article about the
cleanroom branch:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/FPC_Cleanroom
thanks,
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.
19 matches
Mail list logo
