Bernd Mueller wrote:
(very unexpected) result of this benchmark is, that a version with
leaving the TStroke-Record packed, is about 13 % faster than the
original patch. I am going to send a new patch soon.
unfortunately this one is about 10 % slower on X86. So, I am going to
leave this to the
Hello,
I'm trying to compile the latest revision (10436) and I'm having the
above error.
After quick search (find ./ -name currh.inc) I saw that the file
really does not exists.
Ido
--
http://ik.homelinux.org/
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Martin Schreiber schrieb:
On Sunday 02 March 2008 18.48:01 Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
What did I wrong?
I'am not sure how this could be made working just a remark: -Fcutf8
influences _only_ the interpr
> I'm trying to compile the latest revision (10436) and I'm having the
> above error.
> After quick search (find ./ -name currh.inc) I saw that the file
> really does not exists.
Same here on WinXP.
--
Inoussa O.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-deve
On 03 Mar 2008, at 12:40, ik wrote:
I'm trying to compile the latest revision (10436) and I'm having the
above error.
Someone forgot to commit a file yesterday. He will fix it tonight when
gets home from work.
Jonas
___
fpc-devel maillist - f
> I 'm about to file a bug report and would like to have a confirmation.
> The compiler conplains( see the code below ) :
> "Fatal: Syntax error, ")" expected but "(" found"
> It compiles under Delphi ( D7 ). I tried with "mode delphi" and "mode
> objfpc" and still got the
> same syntax erro
2008/3/3, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 03 Mar 2008, at 12:40, ik wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to compile the latest revision (10436) and I'm having the
> > above error.
>
>
> Someone forgot to commit a file yesterday. He will fix it tonight when
> gets home from work.
It does works.
Tha
