Hi,
I use FPCUnit extensively at work and in open source projects like
tiOPF, but I hit a bit of a snag - actually a bug in FPCUnit which
causes many tests to fail for the wrong reasons. Here is one such case
- in the tiOPF project many database tests fail do to Setup Once
issues:
* DUnit2 (hosted in the tiOPF code repository and written by the
late Peter McNab) has some major improvements over the existing DUnit.
Do we incorporate/port that, or merge the DUnit2 code into a new
testing framework that is FPC and Delphi compatible?
For those that don't know about
Hi all,
On Fedora 11 there are some issues with the ld-version. First of all
it's impossible to cycle the compiler using the --build-id flag, because
it generates different id's for each run, so that ppc3 and ppcx64 will
always differ. I'm trying to fix this.
But another issue is that it always
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
I use FPCUnit extensively at work and in open source projects like
tiOPF, but I hit a bit of a snag - actually a bug in FPCUnit which
causes many tests to fail for the wrong reasons. Here is one such case
- in the tiOPF project many database
On 19 May 2009, at 14:04, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
But another issue is that it always complains while compiling:
/usr/bin/ld: warning: link.res contains output sections; did you
forget -T?
This is a new warning that was added to ld.
What does it mean? Does fpc something special with
On 19 May 2009, at 14:06, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I'm afraid I have seriously bad experiences with interfaces in FPC
How so? I'm not aware of any outstanding bugs with interfaces in FPC.
Even the compiler uses them now (only for whole-program optimization
though, so usually you won't
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Is it FPC license compatible? DUnit always had the problem it was MPL.
Umm, I had a look and the code is a fork of the original DUnit, so
DUnit2 still falls under the MPL license.
Regards,
- Graeme -
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
For me, a rewrite is the preferred option.
OK, could you then please list all the things that bug you in the
current FPCUnit, so we don't duplicate the issues.
It should not affect thim, this should be a
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 19 May 2009, at 14:06, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I'm afraid I have seriously bad experiences with interfaces in FPC
How so? I'm not aware of any outstanding bugs with interfaces in FPC. Even
the compiler uses them now (only for whole-program
On 19 May 2009, at 14:53, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 19 May 2009, at 14:06, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I'm afraid I have seriously bad experiences with interfaces in FPC
How so? I'm not aware of any outstanding bugs with interfaces in
FPC.
Graeme Geldenhuys pravi:
Hi,
I use FPCUnit extensively at work and in open source projects like
tiOPF, but I hit a bit of a snag - actually a bug in FPCUnit which
causes many tests to fail for the wrong reasons. Here is one such case
- in the tiOPF project many database tests fail do to
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 19 May 2009, at 14:53, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 19 May 2009, at 14:06, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I'm afraid I have seriously bad experiences with interfaces in FPC
How so? I'm not aware of any
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=12778
Indeed, that is a very handy feature of using interfaces. I'm glad you
mentioned it, otherwise I was going to have some issues with my tiOPF
MVP implementation, which I planed on being
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
I'm afraid I have seriously bad experiences with interfaces in FPC
How so? I'm not aware of any outstanding bugs with interfaces in FPC.
Even the compiler uses them now (only for whole-program optimization
though, so usually you won't test
Op dinsdag 19-05-2009 om 14:42 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jonas
Maebe:
On 19 May 2009, at 14:04, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
But another issue is that it always complains while compiling:
/usr/bin/ld: warning: link.res contains output sections; did you
forget -T?
This is a new
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
Well, e.g.
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=12778
More a delegation problem. Together with 8951 and the pretty old 4842
Another point was trying to get the Mozilla API working. All code works in
Delphi, but fails horribly in FPC.
In our previous episode, Joost van der Sluis said:
way. The warning was added because you seldom want to append your own
linker script to the default one.
However, I don't know whether it's intentional or not that FPC does
not override ld's default internal linker script, so I'm not
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Dean Zobec dean.zo...@gmail.com wrote:
The Setup and Teardown run only once for a set of tests goes against the
philosophy of unit testing actually, as violates the priciple that all
the unit tests should be independent from each other.
The tests in tiOPF are
In our previous episode, Joost van der Sluis said:
way. The warning was added because you seldom want to append your own
linker script to the default one.
However, I don't know whether it's intentional or not that FPC does
not override ld's default internal linker script, so I'm not
On 19 May 2009, at 15:45, Peter Vreman wrote:
The linker scripts without the full SECTIONS details are only used
to reduce the length and
complexity of the commandline.
This is about the linker scripts /with/ SECTIONS details. That's what
the warning is about: there are SECTIONS details
Hi
Regarding bug #12778
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=12778
Like I said before, I am no expert in using Interfaces. But why can't
I do the following (see code below), which works perfectly when I run
the program. Using delegation define or usecorba define in any
combination. It's
The linker scripts without the full SECTIONS details are only used
to reduce the length and
complexity of the commandline.
This is about the linker scripts /with/ SECTIONS details. That's what
the warning is about: there are SECTIONS details in a file not
specified via -T, and therefore
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi
Regarding bug #12778
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=12778
Like I said before, I am no expert in using Interfaces. But why can't
I do the following (see code below), which works perfectly when I run
the program. Using delegation
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
The difference is that you have access to the THook methods/properties.
THook just 'happens' also to implement the interface you need.
Ah, I get it now. So with delegation of a class you get two-in-one.
Access
24 matches
Mail list logo
