Hi *,
In current Delphi is String synonym for base type UnicodeString UTF-16
AFAIU ATM in FPC is String synonym for AnsiString (as in previos
versions of Delphi)
Are there any plans to change meaning of String type ?
(like Delphi to UnicodeString , or UTF8String?)
Are there any plans to intorduc
Am 10.01.2011 05:15, schrieb Paul Ishenin:
10.01.2011 1:47, Andrew Brunner wrote:
Type
NS_APP=class
const
const1=2;
const3=5;
type
NS_SPACE1=class
type
Properties=(Name,Value);
TMyRecord=record
ID : integer;
Name:string;
Value:string;
end;
end;
NS_SPACE2=class
type
Properties=(Name,Value); // Du
On 01/10/2011 09:12 AM, LacaK wrote:
In current Delphi is String synonym for base type UnicodeString UTF-16
AFAIK, in current Delphi (which I don't have) a "String" is a variable
that can contain dynamically coded informations (such as locally coded
8-Bit ANSI, UTF-8, UTF-16, ...) and - of cou
AFAIK, in current Delphi (which I don't have) a "String" is a variable
that can contain dynamically coded informations (such as locally
coded 8-Bit ANSI, UTF-8, UTF-16, ...) and - of course - know which
code it holds.
I understand "By default, variables declared as type String are
*UnicodeSt
On 10 Jan 2011, at 09:12, LacaK wrote:
In current Delphi is String synonym for base type UnicodeString UTF-16
AFAIU ATM in FPC is String synonym for AnsiString (as in previos
versions of Delphi)
Are there any plans to change meaning of String type ?
(like Delphi to UnicodeString , or UTF8Str
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
> > In current Delphi is String synonym for base type UnicodeString UTF-16
> > AFAIU ATM in FPC is String synonym for AnsiString (as in previos
> > versions of Delphi)
> > Are there any plans to change meaning of String type ?
> > (like Delphi to Unicode
On 10 Jan 2011, at 13:33, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
In current Delphi is String synonym for base type UnicodeString
UTF-16
AFAIU ATM in FPC is String synonym for AnsiString (as in previos
versions of Delphi)
Are there any plans to change meaning of
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
> >>
> >> If/when this is done, it will only be with a compiler switch or
> >> directive.
> >
> > (
> > That won't be enough, since that would not change the relevant units
> > and
> > classes to such type. (e.g. tstringlist would remain defined
> > an
On 10 Jan 2011, at 13:57, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
If/when this is done, it will only be with a compiler switch or
directive.
(
That won't be enough, since that would not change the relevant units
and
classes to such type. (e.g. tstringlist would
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
> >> If it's a D2009-style ansistring, does that matter?
> >
> > A lot of conversion, since it will use ansistring(0) so reading/
> > writing
> > ansistring(cp_utf8) will force conversions. (0 means system
> > encoding, $
> > means never convert)
>
Jonas Maebe schrieb:
In current Delphi is String synonym for base type UnicodeString UTF-16
AFAIU ATM in FPC is String synonym for AnsiString (as in previos
versions of Delphi)
Are there any plans to change meaning of String type ?
(like Delphi to UnicodeString , or UTF8String?)
If/when this
On 10 Jan 2011, at 16:27, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
>
>> Why should a tstringlist force ansistring(0)?
>
> I mean that if you locally (for your units) set string=utf8string,
> TStringList still would be ansistring(0) or whatever the default becomes.
On Monday, 10. January 2011 16.27:19 Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> And there are three such cases
>
> - normal FPC and Delph 2007- code : ansistring(0)
> - Lazarus : ansistring=utf8
> - Delphi 2009+ UTF16.
>
- fpGUI: ansistring = utf-8
- MSEgui: existing FPC UnicodeString = utf-16
Martin
___
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 01:12 +, Martin wrote:
> On 03/01/2011 11:30, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > I also promised to build a Windows-gdb binary with the latest Dwarf-3
> > patches from the Archer-project. This can be downloaded here:
> >
> > http://www.lazarussupport.com/downloads/gdb_win32_fe
On 10/01/2011 20:26, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 01:12 +, Martin wrote:
On 03/01/2011 11:30, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
I also promised to build a Windows-gdb binary with the latest Dwarf-3
patches from the Archer-project. This can be downloaded here:
http://www.lazaru
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 20:43 +, Martin wrote:
> On 10/01/2011 20:26, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 01:12 +, Martin wrote:
> >> On 03/01/2011 11:30, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> >>> I also promised to build a Windows-gdb binary with the latest Dwarf-3
> >>> patches from
procedure Something(Param1...);
var
my:TMyData;
procedure Testing; inline; // or whatever
begin
my.test:=0;
end;
begin
MyAPI.DoeSomething(Param1,@Testing);
end;
I want to be able to pass Testing as a variable so the callback can
occur but realize that FPC did not like nested proc.
I did read this however, I don't have the option of rewriting all the
other implements to my api to declare as nested...
http://wiki.freepascal.org/FPC_New_Features_Trunk#Support_for_nested_procedure_variables
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.f
I did some more test., I will check in later...
None of the old dwarf or stabs seems to define the <> operator for classes.
p Foo<>Bar
gives unknown symbold Foo<>Bar
So it does take it as one symbol?
nil
nil is not defined ever.
but under stabs dwarf2 Foo=0 works
Dwarf 3:
While the debugger c
On 11/01/2011 00:23, Martin wrote:
I did some more test., I will check in later...
Variant has also changed. Maybe intended, but no result can be optained...
*** gdb 7.2-50 (fpc trunk / Dwarf3) TTestWatches TTestWatches
TestWatches
&"ptype ArgVariantInt\n"
~"type = Variant = record \n"
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Andrew Brunner
wrote:
> I did read this however, I don't have the option of rewriting all the
> other implements to my api to declare as nested...
>
>
> http://wiki.freepascal.org/FPC_New_Features_Trunk#Support_for_nested_procedure_variables
>
>
Andrew, don't know
21 matches
Mail list logo
