Am 30.12.2011 21:19, schrieb Florian Klämpfl:
> Am 30.12.2011 12:47, schrieb Sergei Gorelkin:
>> 30.12.2011 15:18, Florian Klämpfl пишет:
>>>
>>> I played with this yesterday and what about extended Initialize to
>>> support unmanaged types? In case of an unmanaged type it just calls
>>> fillchar.
Hello Jonas,
Wednesday, December 28, 2011, 2:43:16 PM, you wrote:
>> To me it looks like the code is trying to free some strings or
>> interfaces but at a point where the manager of automated types has
>> been "disabled" so the declaration of a new ansistring "reconnects"
>> it. Maybe it is a cra
Hello Jonas,
Wednesday, December 28, 2011, 2:43:16 PM, you wrote:
JM> The most likely problem is memory corruption by your program.
[...]
JM> give more accurate diagnostics).
A bit more information:
Environment is win32.
The line that raises the exception is in win32callback.inc 2474:
---
31.12.2011 16:58, José Mejuto пишет:
Hello Jonas,
Wednesday, December 28, 2011, 2:43:16 PM, you wrote:
JM> The most likely problem is memory corruption by your program.
[...]
JM> give more accurate diagnostics).
A bit more information:
Environment is win32.
The line that raises the excepti
Hello FPC,
Saturday, December 31, 2011, 3:39:59 PM, you wrote:
SG> r19668 affects codegeneration of constructors and custom enumerators, and
fixes
SG> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=20827
SG> The reported location of crash in your case is likely
SG> unrelated to the actual location of pr
31.12.2011 18:52, José Mejuto пишет:
Hello FPC,
Saturday, December 31, 2011, 3:39:59 PM, you wrote:
SG> r19668 affects codegeneration of constructors and custom enumerators, and
fixes
SG> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=20827
SG> The reported location of crash in your case is likely
Hello,
Subject says it all, yesterday the version of the fixes branch was upped to
2.6.1.
Merging will resume probably a few days after the 2.6.0 release, starting
with database fixes and minor packages and rtl fixes.
Marco
___
fpc-devel maillist -
Hello FPC,
Saturday, December 31, 2011, 5:07:42 PM, you wrote:
>> //if (cs_implicit_exceptions in
>> current_settings.moduleswitches) and
>> // (is_class(procdef.struct) and
>> (procdef.proctypeoption=potype_constructor)) then
>> // maybe_add_constructor_
