[fpc-devel] Attributes

Hi, What is the current state of Delphi attributes in FPC? Mattias ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Re: [fpc-devel] Attributes

Am 22.11.2016 13:16 schrieb "Mattias Gaertner" : > > Hi, > > What is the current state of Delphi attributes in FPC? There is still Joost's branch that's waiting to be merged, but even then this would only contain class attributes. Regards, Sven

Re: [fpc-devel] resources on non-windows platform

21.11.2016 21:13, Anton Kavalenka wrote: Is not the time came for own resource compiler for limited type of resources (BITMAP, CURSOR, MANIFEST, VERSIONINFO)? It should not be a problem for a very limited syntax. But if you look at what delphi resource compiler can do then you find a very

Re: [fpc-devel] Attributes

On 22/11/16 21:46, Maciej Izak wrote: 2016-11-22 21:03 GMT+01:00 Jonas Maebe >: modeswitch prefixedattributes is implemented (and seems it works) and can be used by default in Delphi mode only, so I think this is not the problem.

Re: [fpc-devel] Attributes

2016-11-22 14:27 GMT+01:00 Sven Barth : > There is still Joost's branch that's waiting to be merged, but even then > this would only contain class attributes. I have checked Joost implementation and generally seems ok (logically most important part for me about

Re: [fpc-devel] Attributes

2016-11-22 21:03 GMT+01:00 Jonas Maebe : > a) it breaks the syntax for procedure attributes that has existed since > the beginning in FPC in case such an attribute comes right after a > procedure declaration (like procedure test; [public, alias: 'abc'];). At > the very

Re: [fpc-devel] Attributes

On 22/11/16 20:48, Maciej Izak wrote: I have checked Joost implementation and generally seems ok (logically most important part for me about "when" and "how" is called constructor for attributes is alright). Branch is waiting almost 3 years (sic!). That's because a) it breaks the syntax for

Re: [fpc-devel] Attributes

Am 22.11.2016 um 20:48 schrieb Maciej Izak: > > Branch is waiting almost 3 years (sic!). Joost branch should be part of > NewPascal much much sooner > than official FPC trunk, anyway I have question: Well, Joost has write permissions on FPC trunk, I think he has himself the opinion that the