Re: [fpc-devel] File Dates

2005-01-28 Thread DrDiettrich
Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > What time stamps are in use on the various platforms? > > Too various. I suggest using simply TDateTime. It has microsecond > resolution, which should be more than enough. It offers the additional > advantage that no transformations are necessary for display & compa

Re: [fpc-devel] Lazarus problems with current FPC 1.9.7

2005-01-28 Thread Peter Vreman
> Mattias Gaertner wrote: >> Since a week I get strange, sporadic errors with current fpc. >> For example: >> >> TMainIDE.DoSaveAll >> >> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >> $0a9a0c08 in ?? () >> (gdb) bt >> #0 $0a9a0c08 in ?? () >> First symbol in segment of executable not a s

Re: [fpc-devel] Lazarus problems with current FPC 1.9.7

2005-01-28 Thread Peter Vreman
> Since a week I get strange, sporadic errors with current fpc. > For example: > > TMainIDE.DoSaveAll > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > $0a9a0c08 in ?? () > (gdb) bt > #0 $0a9a0c08 in ?? () > First symbol in segment of executable not a source symbol > > That's why I think,

Re: [fpc-devel] Lazarus problems with current FPC 1.9.7

2005-01-28 Thread Vincent Snijders
Mattias Gaertner wrote: Since a week I get strange, sporadic errors with current fpc. For example: TMainIDE.DoSaveAll Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. $0a9a0c08 in ?? () (gdb) bt #0 $0a9a0c08 in ?? () First symbol in segment of executable not a source symbol That's why I thi

[fpc-devel] Lazarus problems with current FPC 1.9.7

2005-01-28 Thread Mattias Gaertner
Since a week I get strange, sporadic errors with current fpc. For example: TMainIDE.DoSaveAll Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. $0a9a0c08 in ?? () (gdb) bt #0 $0a9a0c08 in ?? () First symbol in segment of executable not a source symbol That's why I think, it's a compiler bug