Hi
latest version form SVN does not even compile.
Is there any plan to have something similar to a mozilla tinderbox?
There are already dailed build snapshots and testsuite results for
i386-linux. See http://www.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/testsuite.cgi
On Sunday 12 June 2005 12.43, Tomas Hajny wrote:
As far as I know, mov instruction doesn't set zero flag. Zero length
is checked earlier in the code, though, so it doesn't matter for that
- just the jz instruction seems to be useless there.
You are right of course, i am not very familiar
On 13 jun 2005, at 08:46, Marco van de Voort wrote:
There also is jecx, (jeecx ? :-),
jecxz
but I don't know if it is faster than
writing it out.
Pretty much all of those old complex instructions (enter, loop,
jecxz, xlatb, ...) are slower than the alternatives.
Jonas
On 13 jun 2005, at 07:24, Jan Ruzicka wrote:
latest version form SVN does not even compile.
It works fine here under Mac OS X (both in fixes and in trunk). Did
you start the cycle with 2.0.0?
Jonas
___
fpc-devel maillist -
On 13 jun 2005, at 09:13, Marco van de Voort wrote:
I was thinking about this before I relpied, and knew this was the
case for
P5-P6 core. However is this verified/documented for generation 7
CPU's ?
(Athlon/Netburst ?)
Why would they suddenly start spending silicon on making
On 13 jun 2005, at 08:46, Marco van de Voort wrote:
There also is jecx, (jeecx ? :-),
jecxz
but I don't know if it is faster than
writing it out.
Pretty much all of those old complex instructions (enter, loop,
jecxz, xlatb, ...) are slower than the alternatives.
I was thinking
On 13 jun 2005, at 09:13, Marco van de Voort wrote:
I was thinking about this before I relpied, and knew this was the
case for
P5-P6 core. However is this verified/documented for generation 7
CPU's ?
(Athlon/Netburst ?)
Why would they suddenly start spending silicon on making
It seems a bug in FPC 2.0.0.(Delphi 7.1 also has this bug)
Assumes there is an object(not class) declaration, the object has a IInterface
field. If we declare another object derive from it, in the cleanup procedure of
that decendant leak to clear the IInterface references.
The test program is
Peter Vreman said:
Hi
latest version form SVN does not even compile.
Is there any plan to have something similar to a mozilla tinderbox?
There are already dailed build snapshots and testsuite results for
i386-linux. See http://www.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/testsuite.cgi
At least daily
To the compiler developers:
In FPC 2.0.0
- Are the fields TTypeData.IntfParent, IID, IIDStr and IntfUnit valid for
tkInterface?
- Is TTypeData.IntfParent really PPTypeInfo or is it PTypeInfo?
- How is TTypeData.IntfUnit aligned?
Thanks, Martin
___
On Monday 13 June 2005 12.59, Peter Vreman wrote:
- How is TTypeData.IntfUnit aligned?
It doesn't need alignment. It consists only of chars.
So offset IIDStr-IntfUnit is 256 (IIDStr = shortstring = string[255])?
Or IntfUnit starts after last char of IIDStr?
On Monday 13 June 2005 12.59, Peter Vreman wrote:
- How is TTypeData.IntfUnit aligned?
It doesn't need alignment. It consists only of chars.
So offset IIDStr-IntfUnit is 256 (IIDStr = shortstring = string[255])?
Or IntfUnit starts after last char of IIDStr?
It is not yet defined. The
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Did it go through the mailing list already? I guess because it contains
an attachement it is held for approval.
Yes, i've already seen it in the list. Anyway, the link to the units is here
http://www.bandarra.org/pascal/stringcomparison/
begin:vcard
Hi all,
i'm curious what happens here. If I make a recursive funtion inlined, it
runs way faster?
Ackerman-test results:
$ ppc386 -O3p3r -dRecursiveInline ackerman.pp cpu/bin/timeit
/home/joost/src/ackerman 10
Ack(3,10): 8189
Execution took 395377 microseconds.
$ ppc386 -O3p3r ackerman.pp
Peter Vreman wrote:
On Monday 13 June 2005 12.59, Peter Vreman wrote:
- How is TTypeData.IntfUnit aligned?
It doesn't need alignment. It consists only of chars.
So offset IIDStr-IntfUnit is 256 (IIDStr = shortstring = string[255])?
Or IntfUnit starts after last char of IIDStr?
It is not
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Hi all,
i'm curious what happens here. If I make a recursive funtion inlined, it
runs way faster?
Ackerman-test results:
$ ppc386 -O3p3r -dRecursiveInline ackerman.pp cpu/bin/timeit
/home/joost/src/ackerman 10
Ack(3,10): 8189
Execution took 395377
Anybody followed the discussion, e.g. which version should be included :)?
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On Jun 13, 2005, at 05:31, Tomas Hajny wrote:
Peter Vreman said:
Hi
latest version form SVN does not even compile.
Is there any plan to have something similar to a mozilla tinderbox?
There are already dailed build snapshots and testsuite results for
i386-linux. See
On Jun 13, 2005, at 05:31, Tomas Hajny wrote:
Peter Vreman said:
Hi
latest version form SVN does not even compile.
Is there any plan to have something similar to a mozilla tinderbox?
There are already dailed build snapshots and testsuite results for
i386-linux. See
19 matches
Mail list logo
