Dani?l Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words, you still need to duplicate an awfull lot of code.
That is the same for 8bit and widestring.
No, that is not true. There would be two rtls based on the same code.
Can you give some examples, what parts of the RTL should
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:27:08 +0100 (CET)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
Dani?l Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words, you still need to duplicate an awfull lot of code.
That is the same for 8bit and widestring.
No, that is not true. There would
Op Thu, 17 Nov 2005, schreef Mattias Gaertner:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:27:08 +0100 (CET)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
Dani?l Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words, you still need to duplicate an awfull lot of code.
That is the same for 8bit
Op Thu, 17 Nov 2005, schreef Daniël Mantione:
E.g. accessing mysql is now done with pchar(ansistring)
And they should be replaced by what?
Pchar(Tnativestring(widestring_variable));
Apparently I got too little sleep or something tonight :) It would be
this:
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Thu, 17 Nov 2005, schreef Daniël Mantione:
E.g. accessing mysql is now done with pchar(ansistring)
And they should be replaced by what?
Pchar(Tnativestring(widestring_variable));
Apparently I got too little sleep or something tonight :) It would be
this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
Dani?l Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words, you still need to duplicate an awfull lot of code.
That is the same for 8bit and widestring.
No, that is not true. There would be two rtls based on the same
Op Thu, 17 Nov 2005, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
This makes no sense. If such a thing is done, the encoding of the actually
used
mysql db must be taken into care.
Nothing is fun with charsets... The above just demonstrates the
idea. File system encoding would be another of those wild west
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:04:01 +0100 (CET)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
Dani?l Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words, you still need to duplicate an awfull lot of
code.
That is the same
Hi
Following this discussion, I want to throw in my 2 cents as well:
On a real long term (like 5 or 10 years from now), the solution
should be as clean as possible with as little awkward parts because
of backward compatibility. This favors of a more separate solution
with a compatibility
From: Marco van de Voort [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
Dani?l Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words, you still need to duplicate an awfull lot of
code.
That is the same for 8bit and widestring.
No, that is not true. There
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:31:45 +0100
Dr. Karl-Michael Schindler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Following this discussion, I want to throw in my 2 cents as well:
On a real long term (like 5 or 10 years from now), the solution
should be as clean as possible with as little awkward parts because
Op Thu, 17 Nov 2005, schreef Mattias Gaertner:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:31:45 +0100
Dr. Karl-Michael Schindler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Following this discussion, I want to throw in my 2 cents as well:
On a real long term (like 5 or 10 years from now), the solution
should be
From: Marco van de Voort [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unicode RTL is needed for people who want to develop unicode applications
from the beginning. In such case the developer will be aware of unicode
and
will write correct code.
All correct, BUT
1) it is not Unicode RTL but Unicode FPC/Lazarus.
2) it
Hi folks,
can you tell if there is a good crypto class for FPC / Lazarus ?
What do you use for crypting your stuff ?
Any opinions are welcome.
TIA.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Op Thu, 17 Nov 2005, schreef Alexander Todorov:
Hi folks,
can you tell if there is a good crypto class for FPC / Lazarus ?
What do you use for crypting your stuff ?
Any opinions are welcome.
There exist many Pascal implementations of cryptographic algorithms, but I
am not aware of a
Op Thu, 17 Nov 2005, schreef Yury Sidorov:
I agree. There is no need to make existing RTL APIs unicode aware, because
there will be no compatibility with existing apps in any case.
So how about to add alternative unicode versions of RTL APIs via overloading
or via adding some suffix (eg.
On Thursday 17 November 2005 13:18, Alexander Todorov wrote:
Hi folks,
can you tell if there is a good crypto class for FPC / Lazarus ?
What do you use for crypting your stuff ?
Any opinions are welcome.
I'd go for openssl. I know we have to implement crypto support at some point
in
On 11/17/05, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking for lazarus: we want to support the whole unicode and UTF8 is the
easiest to achieve that.
I particulary like this solution.
* It doesn´t break existing code
* It makes it easy to make a program unicode. Just change the encoding
On 11/17/05, Daniël Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO the hope is that if there is a Tnativestring, people will
start to design their libraries using Tnativestring, which will result in
that those libraries can be compiled for 8 of 16 bit strings.
This does not fix everything. Some RTL
On Thursday 17 November 2005 14:04, Paul Davidson wrote:
Did some work getting SSL working for FPC. Attached is unit that
exposes most of the functions required. Tested with Darwin and Linux.
Thank you! That's a great starting point. I'll look at it when we are
implementing crypto :)
--
- Original Message -
From: Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11/17/05, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking for lazarus: we want to support the whole unicode and UTF8 is
the
easiest to achieve that.
I particulary like this solution.
* It doesn´t
Op Thu, 17 Nov 2005, schreef Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho:
On 11/17/05, Daniël Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO the hope is that if there is a Tnativestring, people will
start to design their libraries using Tnativestring, which will result in
that those libraries can be compiled
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Hi all,
atm I have a nearly finished mysql.inc file that can be used with MySQL
v4.0 v4.1 and v5.0. Loaded dynamically and static.
It uses several defines to set the right MySQL version and to turn the
dynamically linking on or off.
Create 6 different units in
Em Qui, 2005-11-17 às 14:18 +0200, Alexander Todorov escreveu:
Hi folks,
can you tell if there is a good crypto class for FPC / Lazarus ?
What do you use for crypting your stuff ?
Any opinions are welcome.
Take a look at http://sourceforge.net/projects/tplockbox
Luiz
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Hi all,
atm I have a nearly finished mysql.inc file that can be used with MySQL
v4.0 v4.1 and v5.0. Loaded dynamically and static.
It uses several defines to set the right MySQL version and to turn the
--- Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Hi all,
atm I have a nearly finished mysql.inc file that can be used with
MySQL
v4.0 v4.1 and v5.0. Loaded dynamically and static.
It uses several defines to set the right MySQL version and to
turn the
Paul Davidson wrote:
Did some work getting SSL working for FPC. Attached is unit that
exposes most of the functions required. Tested with Darwin and Linux.
What about putting it in packages/extra? OpenSSL is quite common.
Hope this helps
On Nov 17, 2005, at 7:57, Christian
Will alter the unit, and submit it tomorrow :)
Thanks
On Nov 17, 2005, at 16:06, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Paul Davidson wrote:
Did some work getting SSL working for FPC. Attached is unit that
exposes most of the functions required. Tested with Darwin and Linux.
What about putting it in
Who knows the future?
Maybe in 10 years 16bit non multi 'byte' encoding is sufficient for all
remaining languages.
Or maybe 32bit encodings will become the default.
the unix and web worlds are going utf-8 the ms and java worlds are going
utf-16 both are variable width
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Paul Davidson wrote:
Did some work getting SSL working for FPC. Attached is unit that
exposes most of the functions required. Tested with Darwin and Linux.
What about putting it in packages/extra? OpenSSL is quite common.
I was thinking
30 matches
Mail list logo
