Op Tue, 18 Jul 2006, schreef Jonas Maebe:
You need something more than merely the remapping of library names.
As I said, you can remap unit names. At some point the user will have to
decide to which one he wants to link, doing it by a unit name remap looks
an elegant solution to me.
I
On Monday 17 July 2006 15:33, Micha Nelissen wrote:
Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
Of course they don't. Unlike some other languages where such things
are standardized quite clearly, (most) consistency, dependency and
linking issues are beyond the scope of the official C-standard.
I'm not talking
There is no Mac OS X Quickstart section in the install/doc/readme.txt file,
although needed, in particular for the ReadMe.txt File of Mac OS X .dmg package.
This is my suggestion, which is partly based on what I found in
install/macosx/resources/ReadMe.txt:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
Hello,
The headers are now available for download. The are explanations about
how to make a simple module, example code, internal details and a
download link of the bindings here:
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
The headers are now available for download. The are explanations about
how to make a simple module, example code, internal details and a
download link of the bindings here:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php?title=FPC_and_Apache_Modules
I think using
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Micha Nelissen wrote:
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
The headers are now available for download. The are explanations about
how to make a simple module, example code, internal details and a
download link of the bindings here:
Hi,
I am new to web applications. How does Apache Modules differ from CGI apps?
CGI Apps:
* The application executes, creates output and exits.
* Nothing stays in memory between user input
Apache Modules:
* no idea?
* Can things be kept in memory between user input? example: When
On 7/18/06, Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am new to web applications. How does Apache Modules differ from CGI apps?
CGI Apps:
* The application executes, creates output and exits.
* Nothing stays in memory between user input
Apache Modules:
* no idea?
* You can
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
I am new to web applications. How does Apache Modules differ from CGI apps?
CGI Apps:
* The application executes, creates output and exits.
* Nothing stays in memory between user input
Apache Modules:
* no idea?
Apache loads your module,
Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 01:22:40AM +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote:
libnames when determining how to link, with the default being 1:1.
I know, but I was trying to point out that e.g. on Mac OS X sometimes
you may need
-lgtk-1.2.0 -lgdk-1.2.0 -lgdk_pixbuf
and sometimes
-framework Gtk+-Cocoa
Alright everyone, just stop this ok?
I was angry like hell when I first read the ORIGINAL poster's message
about FreeBSD (hint, topic no longer valid in your discussion) I got
even more angry and my response was very immature. I would like to
apologise to everyone and especialy the original
On 7/18/06, Micha Nelissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think using 'httpd' as unit name is a bit too generic. There are many
more things httpd could mean besides Apache module headers. Maybe
'apache' or 'apache_mod' or so, instead.
I just used the same name the c headers use.
I also used just
On 18 Jul 2006, at 12:05, Aleš Katona wrote:
This whole discussion is useless.
Better library linking support is not useless.
Jonas___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
In response to the text below - I thought it useful to say that I have the
need for a small APP to make a super thin CGI app to compromise between the
process startup of CGI apps without locking myself into a HTTP API or
FastCGI - Still not sure what the benchmarks will reveal but concerning FPC,
In response to the text below - I thought it useful to say that I have the
need for a small APP to make a super thin CGI app to compromise between the
process startup of CGI apps without locking myself into a HTTP API or
FastCGI - Still not sure what the benchmarks will reveal but concerning
On 7/18/06, Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a good resource on the web explaining the differences? Any
help would be great.
There is a table that compares various web technologies here:
http://162.105.203.19/apache-doc/8.htm#BIN21
Apache modules fit into the Server API
Hi all,
I'm hunting a strange bug. The Lazarus IDE works with gtk1 under fpc 2.0.2
on x86_64 without problems.
But with fpc 2.1.1 it crashes when opening any modal form. For example
open file.
Compiling with -gv and starting with valgrind runs without access
violation.
With heaptrc: bug appears
Thanks everybody you taking the time to reply... It seems Apache
Modules can do a lot more that I thought. Well worth reading a bit
more about it!
Regards,
Graeme.
On 7/18/06, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/18/06, Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is
MSE created some patches for fpc 2.0.4 rc1
to fix some widestring and db issues.
http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.cgi/mseide-msegui/trunk/patch_fpc_2_0_4/
I seems they are not applied to rc2.
Can someone with widestring and db knowledge
of fpc dev take a look at this?
The db-files
The db-files in fpc-2.0.4-rc2 are better up-to-date then the mse-one's.
What's left is irrelevent, or in the fopen case, an ugly hack that
shoudn't be there, imho.
So for the db-part, nothing has to change.
thx for checking,
is someone :-) looking to implement/fix blob/text
in the mysql
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 19.11, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
MSE created some patches for fpc 2.0.4 rc1
to fix some widestring and db issues.
http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.cgi/mseide-msegui/trunk/patch_fpc_2_0_
4/
I seems they are not applied to rc2.
Can someone with widestring
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 22:13 +0200, Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 19.11, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
MSE created some patches for fpc 2.0.4 rc1
to fix some widestring and db issues.
http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.cgi/mseide-msegui/trunk/patch_fpc_2_0_
4/
I
On 14 Jul 06, at 9:52, Tomas Hajny wrote:
Hi again,
We're about to start preparation for the next round of testing of release
candidates for 2.0.4 after this weekend. More platforms and builds should
be included this time - in addition to those available in RC1, we expect
to have at least
On 18 Jul 06, at 8:55, Dr. Karl-Michael Schindler wrote:
There is no Mac OS X Quickstart section in the install/doc/readme.txt file,
although needed, in particular for the ReadMe.txt File of Mac OS X .dmg
package.
.
.
Many thanks, it's being added to SVN now and
should appear in 2.0.4.
Это forwarded письмо.
From: Пётр Косаревский с mail.ru [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Joost van der Sluis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2006, 3:47:59 AM
Subject: [fpc-devel] FPC 2.0.4 release candidate 1 testing
===8== Исходный текст ===
*. oracle: examples do not
25 matches
Mail list logo
