-Original Message-
From: Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: FPC developers' list
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 22:01:55 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] rtti, arrays and performance
> Did you see a change in performance ? Can you give an order of magnitude ?
>
For me Shark profi
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Vlad wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm porting my Delphi app to Mac OS X. Fortunately my core classes
> compile fine with freepascal, so I can produce dylib and use it from Cocoa
> application. To make binaries I use fpc 2.0.4 for powerpc version and fpc
> 2.1.1 for intel version
Hi.
I'm porting my Delphi app to Mac OS X. Fortunately my core classes compile
fine with freepascal, so I can produce dylib and use it from Cocoa application.
To make binaries I use fpc 2.0.4 for powerpc version and fpc 2.1.1 for intel
version (2.1.1 snapshot downloaded on August 2, 2006 fr
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Redirected to fpc-devel for a larger audience.
actually this give an alignement error:
PRecInfo(Buffer+FRecInfoOffset)^.BookmarkFlag := Value;(memds line
750, procedure TMemDataset.SetBookmarkFlag)
replacing with this :
APRecInfo:=PRecInfo(Buffer+FRecInfoOffset)
Micha Nelissen wrote:
Vincent Snijders wrote:
tracker item for this? Compiler hacking is out of my league.
It's also "just" pascal, you know ;-).
Sure, but modifying the compiler to reach my goal is an extra
indirection, which makes it more difficult for me.
There is a difference betwe
Op Fri, 6 Oct 2006, schreef Micha Nelissen:
> Vincent Snijders wrote:
> > So if fpc hypothetically would support a type double2 = array[0..1] of
> > double and operators like + - * on it would use the packed double
> > instructions of sse2, then it could be used in the shoutout benchmarks.
>
>
Vincent Snijders wrote:
> So if fpc hypothetically would support a type double2 = array[0..1] of
> double and operators like + - * on it would use the packed double
> instructions of sse2, then it could be used in the shoutout benchmarks.
Isn't it better to generalize this support to vectors ? May
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Vincent Snijders schrieb:
Hi,
I wondered if it is possible to add support for using sse2 packed
doubles in fpc.
I tried to create a sse2doubles type and define a operator + on it.
Eventually I want to move this type and all operators on it to a
separate sse2 unit,
Vincent Snijders wrote:
> tracker item for this? Compiler hacking is out of my league.
It's also "just" pascal, you know ;-).
Micha
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 19:13:42 +0200
Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
> > Maybe there is a deeper meaning, but I guess it a bug.
>
> If you say so, iirc you wrote the gtk2 header conversion :)
Yes, but I didn't add this file.
Thanks.
Mattias
>
> > Can so
Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
Maybe there is a deeper meaning, but I guess it a bug.
If you say so, iirc you wrote the gtk2 header conversion :)
Can someone move
Done.
packages/extra/gtk2/gtkcellrenderercombo.inc
to the other gtk include files
packages/extra/gtk2/gtk+/gtk/gtkcellrendererco
Vincent Snijders schrieb:
Hi,
I wondered if it is possible to add support for using sse2 packed
doubles in fpc.
I tried to create a sse2doubles type and define a operator + on it.
Eventually I want to move this type and all operators on it to a
separate sse2 unit, so that the user of this t
Redirected to fpc-devel for a larger audience.
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: TMemDataset : pb & suggestions
Datum: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:34:51 +0200
Von: Oro06 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Antwort an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: core <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
i'm trying to use TMemDataset on arm/w
Op Fri, 6 Oct 2006, schreef Vincent Snijders:
> Daniël Mantione schreef:
> >
> > Op Fri, 6 Oct 2006, schreef Vincent Snijders:
> >
> > > They are not used, because the same body contains a procedure call
> > > and the
> > > %xmm0 registers are volatile. See also the notes with issue 7533:
> >
Daniël Mantione schreef:
Op Fri, 6 Oct 2006, schreef Vincent Snijders:
They are not used, because the same body contains a procedure call and the
%xmm0 registers are volatile. See also the notes with issue 7533:
http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=7533
This is solveable with SSA, so
Op Fri, 6 Oct 2006, schreef Vincent Snijders:
> They are not used, because the same body contains a procedure call and the
> %xmm0 registers are volatile. See also the notes with issue 7533:
> http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=7533
This is solveable with SSA, so a variable can be in
Vincent Snijders schreef:
I am trying out the sse2 support in fpc 2.1.1 and compile my code with
-Cfsse2.
The program is the mandelbrot benchmark:
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=mandelbrot&lang=fpascal
The innerloop is like this:
Zr := 0; Zi := 0; Tr := 0; T
> I have posted a patch that supplements my original patch to the h2pas
> utility. This removes some WriteLn debug statements that I made. I also
> removed some pointer type redefinitions from the translated header. Those
> pointer types are in ctypes. The patch works works better when you are
Hi,
I wondered if it is possible to add support for using sse2 packed doubles in
fpc.
I tried to create a sse2doubles type and define a operator + on it. Eventually I
want to move this type and all operators on it to a separate sse2 unit, so that the
user of this type doesn't need to see the
Maybe there is a deeper meaning, but I guess it a bug. Can someone move
packages/extra/gtk2/gtkcellrenderercombo.inc
to the other gtk include files
packages/extra/gtk2/gtk+/gtk/gtkcellrenderercombo.inc
Mattias
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@li
20 matches
Mail list logo
