I've implemented the semaphores stuff (with a big bad bug, btw thanks
Jonas for fixing).
Right now I'm thinking about how to go next.
The choices I see right now are:
1. Basicly just clean the current pthreads implementation, make sure
types are not redefined in baseunix/unixtypes and pthreads
Op Mon, 16 Oct 2006, schreef Ales Katona:
Write your ideas on the subject please.
Short answer: Kick pthreads and use kernel threads.
Daniël___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
On 16 Oct 2006, at 22:21, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Mon, 16 Oct 2006, schreef Ales Katona:
Write your ideas on the subject please.
Short answer: Kick pthreads and use kernel threads.
I would only do that once the pthreads stuff is overhauled, since it
requires separate and thus extra
On po , 2006-10-16 at 22:21 +0200, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Mon, 16 Oct 2006, schreef Ales Katona:
Write your ideas on the subject please.
Short answer: Kick pthreads and use kernel threads.
That's a nice idea but there are a few problems.
Kernel threads for example in freeBSD require
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Mon, 16 Oct 2006, schreef Ales Katona:
Write your ideas on the subject please.
Short answer: Kick pthreads and use kernel threads.
They only exist on newer kernels, so at least the current
implementation should be kept as an option for
Op Mon, 16 Oct 2006, schreef Ales Katona:
On po , 2006-10-16 at 22:21 +0200, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Mon, 16 Oct 2006, schreef Ales Katona:
Write your ideas on the subject please.
Short answer: Kick pthreads and use kernel threads.
That's a nice idea but there are a few
