How can I create dynamic libs of the RTL and FCL units under Linux?
Mattias
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On 07 Feb 2007, at 19:51, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
How can I create dynamic libs of the RTL and FCL units under Linux?
In principle you should be able to do it with make shared in the
respective directories. But I would strongly recommend against doing
that, since the interface is by no
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schrieb:
Hello,
The attached patch adds a internal linker for symbian os. Also the
makefile on rtl/symbian needs to be regenerated
I also added many files to rtl/symbian included attached
This is enougth to compile a empty executable, but it won´t run or do
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:00:20 +0100
Jonas Maebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07 Feb 2007, at 19:51, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
How can I create dynamic libs of the RTL and FCL units under Linux?
In principle you should be able to do it with make shared in the
respective directories. But I
On 07 Feb 2007, at 21:45, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
In principle you should be able to do it with make shared in the
respective directories. But I would strongly recommend against doing
that, since the interface is by no means stable and consequently
programs compiled against both newer and
Alexey Tourbin schrieb:
Shouldn't we simply change the ppc386 into fpc ?
---
fpcmmain.pp | 15 +++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fpcmmain.pp b/fpcmmain.pp
index 9a1dd3a..a2a9a90 100644
--- a/fpcmmain.pp
+++ b/fpcmmain.pp
@@ -1146,6 +1146,13 @@
We need a version system.
That's not something we need, but which most OS'es need
(and don't provide, except for hacks like symlinks or
different filenames).
Moreover, it doesn't really solve much unless you like having
20 different versions of the same shared library on your
We need a version system.
That's not something we need, but which most OS'es need
(and don't
provide, except for hacks like symlinks or different filenames).
Moreover, it doesn't really solve much unless you like having 20
different versions of the same shared library on your
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, George Birbilis wrote:
We need a version system.
That's not something we need, but which most OS'es need
(and don't
provide, except for hacks like symlinks or different filenames).
Moreover, it doesn't really solve much unless you like having 20