Re: [fpc-devel] Bringing back fpc 2.3.1 to BeOS

2007-05-24 Thread Olivier Coursiere
Peter Vreman a écrit : Thanks, the patches are applied. One small change in ttyname.inc to use {$ifndef beos} instead of disabling the code for all platforms. Oups ! I forgot this one. This is why code review is important. After updating my working copy, i found that i forgot two lines in

Re: [fpc-devel] [patch] small fpcunit patch from Graeme

2007-05-24 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Dean Zobec wrote: > Graeme Geldenhuys writes: > > > I can't remember the details - the patch was submitted a while back. > > Basically running the GUI, it always writes to the console as well, > > which I think is wrong. So while the tests run, the console gets > > filled

[fpc-devel] [patch] small fpcunit patch from Graeme

2007-05-24 Thread Dean Zobec
Graeme Geldenhuys writes: > I can't remember the details - the patch was submitted a while back. > Basically running the GUI, it always writes to the console as well, > which I think is wrong. So while the tests run, the console gets > filled up as well as the XML test results tab. > I'm attachin

Re: [fpc-devel] [patch] - FPCUnit (new overloaded RegisterTest functions)

2007-05-24 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 5/24/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, The number of my bank account is 232-2548697-22. The time-to-merge is inversely proportional to the amount of money deposited on this account :-) hehehe... Seriously: If people on fpc-core decide it's important and harmless eno

Re: [fpc-devel] [patch] - FPCUnit (new overloaded RegisterTest functions)

2007-05-24 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > On 5/24/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The patch is applied, thank you. > > That was quick. Thanks Michael. > > > > > About the 2.2 branch: we'll have to see. > > Normally there is a feature freeze, so I wouldn't raise

Re: [fpc-devel] [patch] - FPCUnit (new overloaded RegisterTest functions)

2007-05-24 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 5/24/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The patch is applied, thank you. That was quick. Thanks Michael. About the 2.2 branch: we'll have to see. Normally there is a feature freeze, so I wouldn't raise my hopes too much... I thought that much, hence the reason I thoroug

Re: [fpc-devel] [patch] - FPCUnit (new overloaded RegisterTest functions)

2007-05-24 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > Hi, > > Attached is a patch for FPCUnit, to be applied from the root source > directory. I really hope this patch can make it into the 2.2 branch > as well. I took extra care to make sure there is no problems and > tested it in 4 different FPCUn

[fpc-devel] [patch] - FPCUnit (new overloaded RegisterTest functions)

2007-05-24 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Hi, Attached is a patch for FPCUnit, to be applied from the root source directory. I really hope this patch can make it into the 2.2 branch as well. I took extra care to make sure there is no problems and tested it in 4 different FPCUnit projects. Changes: Added two new overloaded RegisterTest

Re: [fpc-devel] Can somebody repair the daily snaphot please?

2007-05-24 Thread vsnijders
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 8:46 pm Subject: [fpc-devel] Can somebody repair the daily snaphot please? > Can somebody repair the daily lazarus snaphot please? > If you are talking about the win32 snapshots, that you have bad luck unless you

[fpc-devel] Can somebody repair the daily snaphot please?

2007-05-24 Thread user1
Can somebody repair the daily lazarus snaphot please? ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Re: [fpc-devel] Bringing back fpc 2.3.1 to BeOS

2007-05-24 Thread Peter Vreman
> Hi all, > > After a long period of inactivity, i finally took the time to update the > BeOS port of fpc. I have successfully compiled the latest trunk > (revision 7420) under BeOS using a new libc based RTL (1.0.* versions > were based on system calls). > > The patch i propose to achieve this is

Re: [fpc-devel] Bringing back fpc 2.3.1 to BeOS

2007-05-24 Thread Marco van de Voort
> After a long period of inactivity, i finally took the time to update the > BeOS port of fpc. I have successfully compiled the latest trunk > (revision 7420) under BeOS using a new libc based RTL (1.0.* versions > were based on system calls). > > The patch i propose to achieve this is in two p