Am 10.11.2010 22:20, schrieb Carl-Philip Haensch:
Hi,
what code style does fpc have?
There is a lot of inconsistency in the units, for example the assembler
units with tai in lower case everything and in other rtl units a clear
camel case..
Is there a style guideline? (link)
For the compiler
On 10 November 2010 18:13, Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com wrote:
As a piece of anecdotal evidence, the fact that FPC
does not properly support interfaces was the reason
for at least one company I worked for to reject it and move to Delphi
2007 instead
(from Delphi 7).
Why didn't they just
On 11 Nov 2010, at 00:21, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On 10 November 2010 18:13, Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com wrote:
As a piece of anecdotal evidence, the fact that FPC
does not properly support interfaces was the reason
for at least one company I worked for to reject it and move to Delphi
Tnx Sven,
I am tracking it down.
the KOL library is notorious for its complexity with include files and
conditionals compiler. It looks like we may have hit a limit somewhere.
With a clean build my example indeed compiles in all modes (although KOL
should use Mdelphi by default)
Tnx for your
Am 11.11.2010 12:09, schrieb Thaddy:
Tnx Sven,
I am tracking it down.
the KOL library is notorious for its complexity with include files and
conditionals compiler. It looks like we may have hit a limit somewhere.
With a clean build my example indeed compiles in all modes (although KOL
should
On 11/11/10 10:18, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 11 Nov 2010, at 00:21, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On 10 November 2010 18:13, Alexander Kleninkle...@gmail.com wrote:
As a piece of anecdotal evidence, the fact that FPC
does not properly support interfaces was the reason
for at least one company I worked
Op 2010-11-11 01:21, Henry Vermaak het geskryf:
Why didn't they just set a bounty or pay a compiler dev to fix it?
Because that is still no guarantee that it will be implemented in a timely
fashion. Our company tried that route before without success. We set a $500
bounty, it was accepted very
On 11-11-2010 0:21, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On 10 November 2010 18:13, Alexander Kleninkle...@gmail.com wrote:
Why didn't they just set a bounty or pay a compiler dev to fix it?
I'm sure that would be cheaper than buying lots of Delphi licences.
Henry
Hello,
Two questions I wanted to ask:
1) There are two variant type defintions (varxxx constants): one in compiler/symdef.pas, another one
in rtl/inc/varianth.inc. Worse, they are out of sync. Is it really necessary to have a separate set
of these definitions in compiler?
2) In FPC,
Am 11.11.2010 15:19, schrieb Sergei Gorelkin:
Hello,
Two questions I wanted to ask:
1) There are two variant type defintions (varxxx constants): one in
compiler/symdef.pas, another one in rtl/inc/varianth.inc. Worse, they
are out of sync. Is it really necessary to have a separate set of
Florian Klaempfl пишет:
Am 11.11.2010 15:19, schrieb Sergei Gorelkin:
Hello,
Two questions I wanted to ask:
1) There are two variant type defintions (varxxx constants): one in
compiler/symdef.pas, another one in rtl/inc/varianth.inc. Worse, they
are out of sync. Is it really necessary to have
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 21:43, Henry Vermaak henry.verm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/11/10 10:18, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Why didn't they just set a bounty or pay a compiler dev to fix it?
I'm sure that would be cheaper than buying lots of Delphi licences.
I don't think that this is something that
- Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com schreef:
Hi,
Attached is a simple console application that outputs a hierarchy of
log
information. Under Delphi 7 we used to use a TInterfacedObject
descendant
to track the call stack. This same trick was very handy for changing
and
Sven Barth schrieb:
Perhaps somewhere a new type section begins between the declaration of
the pointer (Foo = ^Bar) and the declaration of the real type (Bar =
XYZ)? This could easily be the case when includes are used and those
aren't clean ^^ (e.g. packages\sqlite\src\sqlite.inc had a end.
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Op 2010-11-11 01:21, Henry Vermaak het geskryf:
Why didn't they just set a bounty or pay a compiler dev to fix it?
Because that is still no guarantee that it will be implemented in a timely
fashion. Our company tried that route before without
15 matches
Mail list logo
