On 07 Mar 2012, at 01:12, Andrew Haines wrote:
> Just wanted to say I like the new less verbose compilation of fpc trunk.
> Is this part of the result of moving to fpmake?
Sort of, yes, although it would be trivial have regular "make" be less verbose
also (look at e.g. the output of make when c
Hi,
Just wanted to say I like the new less verbose compilation of fpc trunk.
Is this part of the result of moving to fpmake?
Regards,
Andrew Haines
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/f
Am 06.03.2012 17:00, schrieb Jonas Maebe:
On 04 Mar 2012, at 22:44, Torsten wrote:
I would like to check in my changes in the svn repository, but i need
username and password todo this?
Yes, we do not allow public write to the svn repository. There are two
options:
a) you can ask for a pers
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 06.03.2012 17:35, schrieb michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Sven Barth wrote:
Hello together!
I'm currently playing around with fcl-web a bit.
As I'd like to utilize inversion of control (e.g. passing things like
database connection
Am 06.03.2012 17:35, schrieb michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Sven Barth wrote:
Hello together!
I'm currently playing around with fcl-web a bit.
As I'd like to utilize inversion of control (e.g. passing things like
database connections through the constructor [as one possible
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Sven Barth wrote:
Hello together!
I'm currently playing around with fcl-web a bit.
As I'd like to utilize inversion of control (e.g. passing things like
database connections through the constructor [as one possible implementation
of this pattern]) for my modules I'd lik
On 04 Mar 2012, at 22:44, Torsten wrote:
I would like to check in my changes in the svn repository, but i
need username and password todo this?
Yes, we do not allow public write to the svn repository. There are two
options:
a) you can ask for a personal svn branch in which you will then ge
Hello together!
I'm currently playing around with fcl-web a bit.
As I'd like to utilize inversion of control (e.g. passing things like
database connections through the constructor [as one possible
implementation of this pattern]) for my modules I'd like to ask whether
it would be an idea for
Hi,
I think r818 and r819 should be improved. If the htmlformat is chm, it
should not copy the cssfile to the rtl dir, because it might not
exist.
http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&root=docs&revision=818
make distclean rtl.chk HTMLFMT=chm FPCSRCDIR=~/src/fpc/trunk
gives:
...
H
