2012/8/28 Martin laza...@mfriebe.de:
I might be doing something wrong.
I was trying to build a cross compiler (well I took a script that is to
build a arm cross, and only did a search and replace... So there is plenty
of room for error on by side.
Before I go and look deeper: Should it
Am 29.08.2012 01:23 schrieb Hans-Peter Diettrich drdiettri...@aol.com:
Martin schrieb:
C:/FPC/tag_build_2_6_0/fpcsrc/compiler/ppcx64.exe -Ur -Xs -O2 -n -Fui386
-Fusystems -FuC:/fpc/tag_build_2_6_0/fpcsrc/rtl/units/x86_64-win64 -Fii386
-FE. -FUi386
/units/x86_64-win64 -dRELEASE -di386 -dGDB
The Lazarus team is glad to announce the release of:
Lazarus 1.0
At this important stage the current team would like to thank all the past and
current people who were involved in getting us here.
* Thanks also go to the FPC team for providing the compiler that makes it all
Does anyone know if that is valid intel style assembler?
push [rdx]
FPC complains (on intel /win 64 bit).
It's from PascalScript code. (Source\x64.inc) I wonder how to get it work...
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
30.08.2012 2:50, Martin пишет:
Does anyone know if that is valid intel style assembler?
push [rdx]
When an instruction has no register operands, it needs operand size to be
explicitly specified:
push qword ptr [rdx]
FPC complains (on intel /win 64 bit).
It's from PascalScript code.
