Am 25.02.2013 08:27 schrieb silvioprog silviop...@gmail.com:
2013/2/21 Florian Klämpfl flor...@freepascal.org
Am 21.02.2013 19:43, schrieb silvioprog:
Hello,
I generates some PPUs in a version of FPC. I try to use it in other
version of FPC, but it not compiles.
So, can I disable
2013/2/25 Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com
Am 25.02.2013 08:27 schrieb silvioprog silviop...@gmail.com:
2013/2/21 Florian Klämpfl flor...@freepascal.org
Am 21.02.2013 19:43, schrieb silvioprog:
Hello,
I generates some PPUs in a version of FPC. I try to use it in other
This is a major pain to quite a few users - I have some units for which
source is lost from v2.4. Surely some of the reasons for the changes in ppu
version would _not_ cause a problem with later versions if one isn't using
this particular feature?
Maybe someone could generate a (binary?) patch to
On 25.02.2013 13:08, John Lee wrote:
This is a major pain to quite a few users - I have some units for which
source is lost from v2.4. Surely some of the reasons for the changes in
ppu version would _not_ cause a problem with later versions if one isn't
using this particular feature?
This is
On Mon, February 25, 2013 13:42, Sven Barth wrote:
On 25.02.2013 13:08, John Lee wrote:
This is a major pain to quite a few users - I have some units for which
source is lost from v2.4. Surely some of the reasons for the changes in
ppu version would _not_ cause a problem with later versions if
Is the project one that can use shared libraries? Or does the code require
inheritance from the code you want to hide the implementation of?
Jeff.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
2013/2/25 DaWorm daw...@gmail.com
Is the project one that can use shared libraries? Or does the code
require inheritance from the code you want to hide the implementation of?
Jeff.
Is the code for a component that will be commercial. It will use classes
and inheritance.
--
Silvio Clécio
On 25.02.2013 15:19, silvioprog wrote:
2013/2/25 DaWorm daw...@gmail.com mailto:daw...@gmail.com
Is the project one that can use shared libraries? Or does the code
require inheritance from the code you want to hide the
implementation of?
Jeff.
Is the code for a component
I'm guessing that you'd need to be pretty au fait with fpc internals the
code to do this eg because there's no spec, and no tools to help? J
In other words: _If_ someone is motivated enough for such a task, it would
be possible to create a convertor from one PPU version to another (and I
2013/2/25 Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com
On 25.02.2013 15:19, silvioprog wrote:
2013/2/25 DaWorm daw...@gmail.com mailto:daw...@gmail.com
Is the project one that can use shared libraries? Or does the code
require inheritance from the code you want to hide the
On Mon, February 25, 2013 15:39, John Lee wrote:
I'm guessing that you'd need to be pretty au fait with fpc internals the
code to do this eg because there's no spec, and no tools to help? J
One would need to combine the original version of the PPU loader (as
included within the compiler source
Am 25.02.2013 15:39, schrieb John Lee:
I'm guessing that you'd need to be pretty au fait with fpc internals
the code to do this eg because there's no spec, and no tools to help? J
ppudump.
If I'd lost the source of a unit I need (if the unit isn't too big), I'd
just ppudump the .ppu and write
On 2/25/2013 02:27, silvioprog wrote:
2013/2/21 Florian Klämpfl flor...@freepascal.org
mailto:flor...@freepascal.org
Am 21.02.2013 19:43, schrieb silvioprog:
Hello,
I generates some PPUs in a version of FPC. I try to use it in other
version of FPC, but it not
Tomas Hajny schrieb:
If you'd disable the check you would not be able to use e.g. a 2.4 unit
with 2.6, because the PPU format is different and thus you'd definitely
(not just perhaps!) get errors when the compiler reads the PPU file.
In other words: _If_ someone is motivated enough for such a
14 matches
Mail list logo