Le 2013-05-28 22:41, Paul Ishenin a écrit :
29.05.2013 10:09, Michel Catudal пишет:
My platform is odroid U2 with funtoo Linux, desktop is mate. Processor is a
4 core arm processor from Samsung, running at 1.7Ghz with 2G of RAM, OS runs
on a 32G SD Card. I also have an Ubuntu system also on
29.05.2013 14:06, Michel Catudal пишет:
The one that I compiled before the code was broken
To answer on your question I need to know paticular compiler version.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Hi,
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 15:01 +0800, Paul Ishenin wrote:
29.05.2013 14:06, Michel Catudal пишет:
The one that I compiled before the code was broken
(note: the last working armhf compiler was generated by daily builds on
8th of May)
To answer on your question I need to know paticular
29.05.2013 2:08, Sergei Gorelkin пишет:
29.05.2013 1:26, Michael Ring пишет:
I did the changes, parts of the opcodes now work fine, I think I have found the
problem with the li
+ and + mfc0 op-codes, if last parameter is 0 then the asm statement is
generated wrong:
This works:
and
Le 2013-05-29 03:01, Paul Ishenin a écrit :
29.05.2013 14:06, Michel Catudal пишет:
The one that I compiled before the code was broken
To answer on your question I need to know paticular compiler version.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin
Here is more detailed info. I guess my answer was a
This is looking good now on first view, all statements seem to pass
through now.
The only thing not working is the register error in mfc0 (and friends)
command.
Now I will wade through some more code to find out why my nice param
-CpMIPS32R2 is ignored by assembler, it still defaults to
For those reading this on fpc-devel the context is that the upload of
fpc 2.6.2 to debian failed on most architectures and I would like
upstream input on sorting it out.
Abou Al Montacir wrote:
Many targets are broken: powerpc, sparc, armel, armhf. The error message
looks very similar on 3
