Hello,
I've got two FPC versions installed on my Linux x64 box: 2.6.4 as a
bootstrap and 2.7.1 for building Lazarus. Both were installed through
'make zipinstall' from svn and untaring to /usr, hence they reside under
/usr/lib64/fpc/2.6.4/ and /usr/lib64/fpc/2.7.1/ accordingly. The
switching
In our previous episode, Gennadiy Poryev said:
I've got two FPC versions installed on my Linux x64 box: 2.6.4 as a
bootstrap and 2.7.1 for building Lazarus. Both were installed through
'make zipinstall' from svn and untaring to /usr, hence they reside under
/usr/lib64/fpc/2.6.4/ and
On Friday 17 Oct 2014 23:02:29 John Lee wrote:
Looks as if you have a working fpc 2.7.1 snapshot for rpi. IAre you
planning to make this available on your web site? If not, can you zip pls
it, and put it on cloud or some ftp site - I'll then put it on fpc ftp site.
John
I was intending to
On Saturday 18 Oct 2014 12:12:26 Marco van de Voort wrote:
...
(fpdoc requiring crt*)
crt* files are part of build-essentials and are basically *nix binary
startup code.
Most binaries don't need them, since they use RTL supplied versions of these
startup files for pascal-only programs.
On Sunday 19 Oct 2014 02:32:49 peter green wrote:
Paul Michell wrote:
I'm currently trying to build 2.7.1 from SVN on the latest Raspbian
(2014-09-09).
I've previously built this with either 2.6.0 from the repository, or with
Thaddy de Koning's build from March 2014.
Currently,
In our previous episode, Paul Michell said:
Ideally, I would like to establish a build process that doesn't require any
changes to the FPC codebase.
Then you must learn to setup a complete cross-compile setup, including
target libraries and startup, and make sure the compiler only finds those.
ok, thanks, let me know where I can get rpi wheezy or jessie binary when
you are ready I'll publish it as an fpc ftp snapshot. I'll do same for
2.6.x too.
John
On 20 October 2014 10:59, Paul Michell p...@michellcomputing.co.uk wrote:
On Friday 17 Oct 2014 23:02:29 John Lee wrote:
Looks as
Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Gennadiy Poryev said:
I've got two FPC versions installed on my Linux x64 box: 2.6.4 as a
bootstrap and 2.7.1 for building Lazarus. Both were installed through
'make zipinstall' from svn and untaring to /usr, hence they reside under
In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said:
This still assumes 2.6.x and 2.7.x can use the same fpc binaries, and is
no solution for the rest.
I'm not up to date on trunk, but so far using the most-recent fpc seems
compatible with all of 2.2.4 through 2.6.x on multiple native
John Lee wrote:
I'll do same for 2.6.x too.
Note that plain 2.6.x doesn't support armhf, in debian/raspbian we have
a patch adding support.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
thank you,
but my question was more about where to put fpc.cfg so that both
versions can use it properly, or, if that is not possible, where to
stuff different fpc.cfg's for the same purpose?
and what would be the basepath in either case?
On 20-10-2014 12:47, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In
11 matches
Mail list logo
