I have been trying to build FPC on an Arietta G25:
http://www.acmesystems.it/arietta[1]
I have downloaded the stock arm 2.6.4 from here:
ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/languages/pascal/fpc/dist/2.6.4/arm-linux/fpc-2.6.4.arm-linux.tar
And the current source snapshot from here:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Tomas Hajny xhaj...@hajny.biz wrote:
I've finished implementation of solution for easier parsing of
supported values for certain options and the solution _does_ match
the compiler capabilities because the values come from the particular
compiler itself.
Thanks.
On Wed, November 12, 2014 13:03, Juha Manninen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Tomas Hajny xhaj...@hajny.biz wrote:
I've finished implementation of solution for easier parsing of
supported values for certain options and the solution _does_ match
the compiler capabilities because the
Thanks Jonas,
I enabled tf_safecall_exceptions for system_i386_darwin_info and it is
working for my particular need.
I am using jcl (JclCompression) and the unix port of 7zip (p7zip) to
provide 7z support for our app. Official current JclCompression is
MSWINDOWS only and uses safecall for
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 7:03 AM, Juha Manninen juha.mannine...@gmail.com
wrote:
The fact still is that fpc -h + a parser in Lazarus requires the
least amount of maintenance in the long run.
The help output already listed the vast majority of all options.
Is there an exclusion for -P option
On 12 Nov 14, at 16:32, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 7:03 AM, Juha Manninen juha.mannine...@gmail.com
wrote:
The fact still is that fpc -h + a parser in Lazarus requires the
least amount of maintenance in the long run.
The help output already listed the vast
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Dmitry Boyarintsev
skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there an exclusion for -P option in the parser?
After all the flag make sense for fpc but not ppcXXX.
No but IMO it should be excluded from the user choices.
The parser calls the compiler with
On 13 Nov 14, at 0:20, Juha Manninen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Dmitry Boyarintsev
skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there an exclusion for -P option in the parser?
After all the flag make sense for fpc but not ppcXXX.
No but IMO it should be excluded from the user
On 13 Nov 14, at 0:20, Juha Manninen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Dmitry Boyarintsev
skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there an exclusion for -P option in the parser?
After all the flag make sense for fpc but not ppcXXX.
No but IMO it should be excluded from the user
