May i use debugln() to put messages on screen (to separate window,
console, or whatever) ?
I mean normal function mode (non-debugging) of Lazarus IDE.
This question motivated by needs to workaround of bugs such as descibed
in mantis issue #10120, see reply #19578.
* Andrey Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:36:55 +0300]:
May i use debugln() to put messages...
The --debug-log=log_file_name parameter usable together with
debugln().
Tnhanks to Mattias Gaertner.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel
* Andrey Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:22:33 +0300]:
Why IDE cannot find LCL and others-but-by-path-available units, when i
open form, placed to other than project directory (that also included
in
paths) ?
And why lazarus IDE have builded with FPC 2.2.0 (thanks to Vincent
* Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Thu, 15 Nov 2007
00:04:22 +0100]:
I think, is that, nevertheless, must considered as bug!
Yes.
I will construct the quite simple sample (ha'), and bring new issue.
___
fpc-devel maillist -
* Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Thu, 15 Nov 2007
00:13:03 +0100]:
I may have misunderstood your descriptions in the bug tracker.
It was not clear to me, that you added the units to the project,
because the example showed no package dependency and a lot absolute
paths.
Exactly thus: some
from issue comments (by Mattias Gaertner):
The codetools are not as strict as the compiler,
can skip some simple syntax errors, and only reads what is needed,
but it needs at least the units. Of course it would be theoretically
possible to write some heuristics to guess what might be right,
but
I have ask to all at once.
==
* Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Thu, 15 Nov 2007
You don't need to add every unit to a project or package. It is
sufficient to add the the directories to the unit search path.
But for update checks, and quick searches it is recommended
* Jonas Maebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:06:54
+0100]:
I'm not sure why it didn't cause problems before, but two of the four
DNS servers ...
http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/my_view_page.php not functional from
~11:00 MSK
___
fpc-devel
* Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Fri, 16 Nov 2007
11:44:26 +0100]:
Can you send me the debug log and tell me the file structure?
The --debug-out result is empty (i.e. namely the log file was not
created).
File with form ancestor (fetched from my combat project) has publised in
#10176
* Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Fri, 16 Nov 2007
00:29:26 +0100]:
Please give feedback in the bug tracker, what part of the bug is still
open.
How i can make give back the previous read units behaviour, with last
12893 revision ?
That to my logging patch will efficient.
Sample project,
* Andrey Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:35:26 +0300]:
I can, sure, implement closing checking myself in my forms, but, i
sure,
ShowModal() is erroneous to call
Application.Idle() after form closing.
Or, probably, TApplicationProperties component implementation erroneous
TCustomForm.ShowModal() implementation have call to Application.Idle()
after closing form, for what ??
background: My some forms idle tasks have appeal to form's visual
components, so i got AV.
I use standart TApplicationProperties.OnIdle() event.
I can, sure, implement closing checking myself
* Andrey Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:17:46 +0300]:
It seems somewhat pulled what was not included to paths...
But it is compile-able with IDE.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org
Some units cannot be found by IDE (in editor), as earlier.
--- (from message box)
C:\Works-FContr\Contracts\gen\gen2\WaybillG.pas(13,50) Error: unit not
found: darrInt
---
but, corresponding directory is correctly prescibed to both compiler and
IDE paths
(first and third boxes in compiler
* Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Fri, 16 Nov 2007
12:35:26 +0100]:
There is always some output. Are you sure, that you used the
--debug-log=C:\lazlog.txt parameter correctly?
Sorry, mistyped.
The log is attached.
Yes, but this example works here (linux,fpc 2.3.1) without errors
(except
* Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Tue, 20 Nov 2007
01:14:27 +0100]:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:08:20 +0300
Andrey Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Andrey Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:35:26 +0300]:
Can anybody explain to me, why dynamically created forms
* Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Tue, 20 Nov 2007
10:55:49 +0100]:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:40:41 +0300
Andrey Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Tue, 20 Nov 2007
01:14:27 +0100]:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:08:20 +0300
Andrey Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
* Andrey Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:57:08 +0300]:
In what order files list (files node) do sort of filenames - it quite
unsorted in my opinion. (see snap).
For long filenames lists it must be problematic, to navigate through
they.
It is reasonable, to expect of sort ability
That strange, developers team do nothing without ready sample.
See http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=10457
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
* Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Sat, 22 Dec 2007
00:43:37 +0100 (CET)]:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Andrey Gusev wrote:
That strange, developers team do nothing without ready sample.
See http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=10457
First of all, it is not correct that they 'do
OK, subject is closed.
I have been angry on Friday, about 20 reports to LazReport should be
transformed (by hands, as i undestanded)...
And here still these errors (codepages in LazReport is critical to my
projects)...
Thanks:
to Michael Van Canneyt for explanations about error tracking
21 matches
Mail list logo
