Re: [fpc-devel]compiler error

2004-03-12 Thread Tomas Hajny
From:Christopher Kirkpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [fpc-devel]compiler error Date sent: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:56:54 + New CVS tonight (fpc 1.9.3); SuSE linux v9.0, starting with compiler fpc 1.0.10 Trying to make all produces following

[fpc-devel]Re: Free Pascal Question (fwd)

2004-05-10 Thread Tomas Hajny
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 10:45:48 +0100 From: Julia Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Free Pascal Question Dear Andrew We can try to help you in resolving your issues (see my comments below), but it might be better to ask your questions in our fpc- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing

Re: [fpc-devel]cursory acquaintance with MacOS RTL

2004-07-02 Thread Tomas Hajny
Olle Raab said: 04-06-29 09.38, skrev Pavel V. Ozerski följande: Hello all, 10 years ago I programmed a little on ThinkPascal therefore could point to some inconveniences that seem to be reproduced in FPC. As is known, common file names are not enough in MacOS to comfortable file access

Re: [fpc-devel]gdb issue

2004-08-02 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 19:34:16 +0300, Rimgaudas Laucius wrote Hi i tried to view integer variable value in binary mode using gdb (5.2.1, windows, fpc1010 ) command p /t i. But it shows nothing. Does anyone else come across this issue or i am doing something wrong? You need to change all

Re: [fpc-devel]Translation language file: danish

2004-09-12 Thread Tomas Hajny
From: Christian Iversen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:[fpc-devel]Translation language file: danish Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date sent:

Re: [fpc-devel]const sLineBreak

2004-09-21 Thread Tomas Hajny
2004 16:52:54 +0200 Uytkownik Tomas Hajny napisa: On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 23:59:57 +0200, Darek Mazur wrote Uytkownik Michael Van Canneyt napisa: . . And second I don't understand why You don't want change it. I don't see any true reason to left it unchanged. Everybody, who want to control

Re: [fpc-devel]const sLineBreak

2004-09-22 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:51:06 +0200, Darek Mazur wrote Uytkownik Tomas Hajny napisa: From: Darek Mazur [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date sent: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:52:54 +0200 . . A new procedure SetTextLineEnding (var T: text; S: string) was added to System unit in CVS

Re: [fpc-devel]const sLineBreak

2004-09-22 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:32:27 +0200, Darek Mazur wrote Uytkownik Tomas Hajny napisa: On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:51:06 +0200, Darek Mazur wrote Uytkownik Tomas Hajny napisa: From: Darek Mazur [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date sent: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:52:54 +0200 . . A new

Re: [fpc-devel]Hints and Warning enabled and disabled

2004-09-22 Thread Tomas Hajny
From: Darek Mazur [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [fpc-devel]Hints and Warning enabled and disabled Date sent: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:57:30 +0200 Uytkownik Michael Van Canneyt napisa: On Wed, 22 Sep 2004,

Re: [fpc-devel] bug report

2004-10-11 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:10:57 -0700 (PDT), Chess Player wrote Peter Vreman wrote It is already fixed in 1.9.4 Compiling with 1.9.4 produces error messages, ending with error setting exception n0D error setting exception n0E error setting exception n0F . . The bug has been fixed, but

Re: [fpc-devel] bug report

2004-10-12 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 08:58:09 +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote On 12 okt 2004, at 07:04, Chess Player wrote: To give the windows version a more rigorous test, I compiled a DOS filter program I wrote as a partial replacement for ANSI.SYS. It failed to display ANSI pictures properly; it seems

Re: [fpc-devel] gui console in windows

2004-11-08 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 22:59:08 +0300, Rimgaudas Laucius wrote Hello, You can simply create a wingui unit which is e.g. graph based and which redirects input/output. Nobody will stop you from creating a faster console under Windows. At least don't expect anything to be written by the

Re: [fpc-devel] external problem

2004-11-25 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 18:18:45 +0100, rstar wrote interface procedure dfCrap(setoperation: Tso); cdecl; implementation {$LINK dfc.ow} //GCC object file style procedure dfCrap(setoperation: Tso); cdecl; external; ... The declaration does exist in the interface! Yes, that's the

RE: [fpc-devel] THandle and 64bit platforms

2004-12-20 Thread Tomas Hajny
Date sent: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:02:04 +0100 To: FPC developers' list [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Marc Weustink [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: [fpc-devel] THandle and 64bit platforms Send reply to: FPC developers' list [EMAIL

RE: [fpc-devel] THandle and 64bit platforms

2004-12-20 Thread Tomas Hajny
Date sent: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:50:06 +0100 (CET) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], FPC developers' list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: [fpc-devel] THandle and 64bit platforms Copies to: Send reply

Re: [fpc-devel] resourcestrings file

2004-12-29 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 18:23:52 +0100, Florian Klaempfl wrote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Added to the wiki for future reference: http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Using_resourcestrings I guess it's not in the docs yet else Michael would provide a link :) Slightly updated (in Wiki).

Re: [fpc-devel] Portability Standards

2005-01-02 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 23:35:10 +0100 (Romance Standard Time), Michael Van Canneyt wrote On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, DrDiettrich wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: . . 2) File Restructuring I've separated the spaghetti code in AbUtils.pas into distinct MSWINDOWS and UNIX sections, each containing

RE: [fpc-devel] Portability Standards

2005-01-03 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:56:07 -, peter green wrote -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marco van de erstanding of include files. Codetools don't work at all if you use include files. That said: $ifdefs confuse it as well... That

Re: [fpc-devel] FPC 1.9.6 (a.k.a. 2.0.0-RC1) is out

2005-01-04 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:41:59 +0100, DrDiettrich wrote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If no major bugs are found, version 2.0 will be released in a short timeframe. I would like to test the Win32 distribution, but the archives are too big for an download (narrow band) :-( . . You can always

Re: [fpc-devel] Portability Standards

2005-01-04 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 02:14:33 +0100, DrDiettrich wrote . . I only don't know how to implement or check the other branches - is the Windows version of FPC equipped for crosscompilation? The compiler itself can compile for all platforms listed in help pages (those running on the same CPU).

Re: [fpc-devel] OS/2 install program

2005-01-05 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:56:36 +1000, Arnstein Prytz wrote Thank you for the latest FreePascal update for OS/2. Unfortunately, I am unable to run the install.exe program which comes with the os2196.zip distribution. It seems that the IDE-type window comes up but the program terminates

Re: [fpc-devel] OS/2 install program

2005-01-05 Thread Tomas Hajny
From: Tomas Hajny [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Arnstein Prytz [EMAIL PROTECTED], FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org Subject:Re: [fpc-devel] OS/2 install program Date sent: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:39:35 +0100 Thank

Re: [fpc-devel] Portability Standards

2005-01-07 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:29:45 +0100, DrDiettrich wrote Tomas Hajny wrote: I only don't know how to implement or check the other branches - is the Windows version of FPC equipped for crosscompilation? The compiler itself can compile for all platforms listed in help pages The problem

Re: [fpc-devel] The new 1.9.6 release

2005-01-12 Thread Tomas Hajny
Ladislav Lacina wrote: There are many problems in this version - at least under the GO32V2 target. Mainly the things asociated with the FreeVision. Even the installer doesn't work properly. The mouse is not visible and the 'OK' button is in strange way hidden. Nor in the IDE is the

Re: [fpc-devel] (no subject)

2005-01-13 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:04:10 +0100 (CET), Ladislav Lacina wrote Message: 2 Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:31:41 +0100 From: Tomas Hajny [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] The new 1.9.6 release To: FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content

Re: [fpc-devel] utf8 reading

2005-03-10 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:43:07 +0100, Florian Klaempfl wrote Uberto Barbini wrote: What would be the correct solution? I am showing my ignorance of multi byte characater handling here, but I think it would be to write an escaped sequence as is currently done for wide strings. I don't think

Re: [fpc-devel] Quick patch for bug 3762

2005-03-30 Thread Tomas Hajny
From: Sterling Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org Subject: [fpc-devel] Quick patch for bug 3762 Date: 30.3.2005 - 12:18:31 Hi Sterling Turns out the CRT unit in OS/2 -- which, by my searches, uses #13#10 as CRLF -- was recognizing #13 alone as CRLF. #10 was completed

Re: [fpc-devel] Patch for bug 2453

2005-03-30 Thread Tomas Hajny
From: Sterling Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org Subject: [fpc-devel] Patch for bug 2453 Date: 30.3.2005 - 12:18:36 This is my first shot, so be gentle :-) The patch assumes FP wants sufficient compatibility with BP 7. If so, it fixes two problems; if not, at

Re: [fpc-devel] webserver

2005-03-30 Thread Tomas Hajny
Date sent: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:44:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org Subject:Re: [fpc-devel] webserver Send reply to: FPC developers' list

Re: RE: [fpc-devel] Quick patch for bug 3762

2005-03-30 Thread Tomas Hajny
From: Sterling Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org Subject: RE: [fpc-devel] Quick patch for bug 3762 Date: 31.3.2005 - 8:26:06 I'd certainly be willing to give it a try. Granted, I only have Windows XP, but if I'm careful it should be a smooth transition. No promises

Re: [fpc-devel] Quick patch for bug 3762

2005-03-31 Thread Tomas Hajny
From: Thomas Schatzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] Quick patch for bug 3762 Date: 31.3.2005 - 12:44:20 Sterling Bates schrieb: In response to Tomas Hajny: I'd certainly be willing to give it a try. Granted, I only

Re: [fpc-devel] Quick patch for bug 3762

2005-04-01 Thread Tomas Hajny
From: DrDiettrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] Quick patch for bug 3762 Date: 31.3.2005 - 22:49:06 The main problem is that there's a lot platform independent functionality in Crt unit which is re-implemented for every

Re: [fpc-devel] Patch for bug 2453

2005-04-03 Thread Tomas Hajny
Date sent: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:13:36 -0500 (EST) From: Sterling Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org Subject:[fpc-devel] Patch for bug 2453 Send reply to: FPC developers' list

Re: [fpc-devel] lazarus bug report + fix: Utf8ToUnicode doesn't work correctly

2005-05-04 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Wed, May 4, 2005 12:07, Jonas Maebe said: On 4 mei 2005, at 12:04, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: It contains a fixed version of the Utf8ToUnicode function. Since it is part of the rtl, I close this lazarus issue and send you this message. I did not test the fixed version. The files in

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-22 Thread Tomas Hajny
Date sent: Sun, 22 May 2005 12:03:37 +0200 To: Ivan Shikhalev [EMAIL PROTECTED], FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org From: Peter Vreman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms Copies to:

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-22 Thread Tomas Hajny
Date sent: Sun, 22 May 2005 12:03:37 +0200 To: Ivan Shikhalev [EMAIL PROTECTED], FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org From: Peter Vreman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms At 11:46 22-5-2005, you wrote: What's about Go32v2 or some other DOS port?

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-23 Thread Tomas Hajny
Peter Vreman said: Vinzent Hoefler wrote: There is no maintainer for go32v2. Unless there is an user that steps forward to be the maintainer for go32v2 there will be no DOS release anymore. . . Alright. How much time would someone need for that task? Or, to be more specific: what is known to

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-25 Thread Tomas Hajny
Vinzent Hoefler said: Ok, first status on the matter: Tonight I've spent some time with the sources and my Win2K machine. For me it seems as the Makefile(.fpc)'s are not yet up to date for the go32v2 target (object files didn't get deleted on cleanall, some unit paths were missing, that sort

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-26 Thread Tomas Hajny
Vinzent Hoefler said: On Wednesday 25 May 2005 14:51, Tomas Hajny wrote: . . recommend starting with this part (for building the compiler at least - Win2K etc. provide better error checking mechanisms, so e.g. SIGSEGVs can be completely undetected under W9x, whereas W2K shows them

Re: [fpc-devel] some little errors/notes

2005-05-26 Thread Tomas Hajny
compiler and RTL versions. Thanks for your comments/hints! Tomas Tomas Hajny, [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Internet ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Re: [fpc-devel] Error..

2005-05-29 Thread Tomas Hajny
From: Matthias Hryniszak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org Date sent: Sat, 29 May 2004 12:56:44 +0200 Subject:[fpc-devel] Error.. Send reply to: FPC developers' list

Re: [fpc-devel] Error..

2005-05-29 Thread Tomas Hajny
From: Matthias Hryniszak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org Date sent: Sat, 29 May 2004 12:56:44 +0200 Subject:[fpc-devel] Error.. Send reply to: FPC developers' list

Re: [fpc-devel] Range check error in cthreads (make debug)

2005-06-02 Thread Tomas Hajny
Date sent: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 10:30:25 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org Subject:[fpc-devel] Range check error in cthreads (make debug) Send reply to: FPC developers' list

Re: [fpc-devel] Patch to speed up Uppercase/Lowercase functions

2005-06-12 Thread Tomas Hajny
From: Martin Schreiber [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FPC developers' list fpc- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [fpc-devel] Patch to speed up Uppercase/Lowercase functions Date sent: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 00:12:44 +0200 Some more test results

Re: [fpc-devel] Bug: fpc-svn-392 compile error

2005-06-13 Thread Tomas Hajny
Peter Vreman said: Hi latest version form SVN does not even compile. Is there any plan to have something similar to a mozilla tinderbox? There are already dailed build snapshots and testsuite results for i386-linux. See http://www.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/testsuite.cgi At least daily

Re: [fpc-devel] Bug: fpc-svn-392 compile error

2005-06-14 Thread Tomas Hajny
Peter Vreman said: On Jun 13, 2005, at 05:31, Tomas Hajny wrote: Peter Vreman said: Hi latest version form SVN does not even compile. Is there any plan to have something similar to a mozilla tinderbox? There are already dailed build snapshots and testsuite results for i386-linux. See

Re: [fpc-devel] Strange behaviour of ;

2005-10-21 Thread Tomas Hajny
Date sent: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:46:05 +0200 (CEST) Subject:Re: [fpc-devel] Strange behaviour of ; From: Peter Vreman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org Send reply to: FPC developers'

Re: [fpc-devel] Strange behaviour of ;

2005-10-22 Thread Tomas Hajny
Date sent: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 09:14:53 +0200 From: Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org Subject:Re: [fpc-devel] Strange behaviour of ; Tomas Hajny

Re: [fpc-devel] (no subject)

2005-11-07 Thread Tomas Hajny
Marco van de Voort wrote: Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1: -Skload fpcylix unit what is it for? Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers for Kylix compat that we _really_ didn't want in the normal system/sysutils unit. BTW, looking at the

Re: Re[2]: [fpc-devel] License of RTL

2005-11-12 Thread Tomas Hajny
Date sent: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:40:38 +0300 From: Pavel V. Ozerski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: IEPhB RAS To: FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org Subject:Re[2]: [fpc-devel] License of RTL Send reply to:

Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode RTL

2005-11-16 Thread Tomas Hajny
Daniël Mantione napsal(a): Hi, Please check this discussion: http://community.freepascal.org:1/bboards/message?message_id=172880forum_id=24092 Short summary: * Many places in the rtl use single character strings, i.e. ansistrings. * To make them Unicode proof they need to be changed

Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode RTL

2005-11-16 Thread Tomas Hajny
Daniël Mantione wrote: Op Wed, 16 Nov 2005, schreef Tomas Hajny: Big overhead (double maintenance efforts for all targets supporting this schisma). :-( I'd say it's better to successively identify the weak points and address these case by case. I know, I'm all for abolishing Chinese

Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode RTL

2005-11-16 Thread Tomas Hajny
Florian Klaempfl wrote: Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: On 11/16/05, Daniël Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know, I'm all for abolishing Chinese (and perhaps Korean), the only language(s) that absolutely cannot be written in with an 8 byte code. why not remove all languages that

Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode RTL

2005-11-16 Thread Tomas Hajny
Marco van de Voort napsal(a): Dani?l Mantione wrote: pos('?','Dani?l'); ... has a different implementation for utf-8 and 8-bit code pages. Why? With utf-8 a string is searched, with 8-bit cp one char. No other char/sequence of char other than ? can generate the byte sequence

Re: [fpc-devel] Coding Questions

2005-12-03 Thread Tomas Hajny
From: VisionForce [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FreePascal Developer fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org Date sent: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 21:26:49 -0600 Subject:[fpc-devel] Coding Questions Send reply to: FPC developers' list

Re: [fpc-devel] functions within record declarations

2005-12-05 Thread Tomas Hajny
Christopher Cureau wrote: Hi, I've been trying to compile some code that used to work in version 1.0.10 of the compiler, but now seems to give errors. In each of the errors below, it looks like a function is being put into a record, and the compiler doesn't like it. I have pasted the

Re: [fpc-devel] add external links to fpdoc generated documents

2006-03-11 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 10 Mar 06, at 15:48, Marco van de Voort wrote: On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Vincent Snijders wrote: Hi, I would like to add a link to external documentation in a fpdoc generated document file. Is this possible. For example: On

Re: [fpc-devel] About bug 4928

2006-03-31 Thread Tomas Hajny
Maxim Ganetsky wrote: There is another bug (bug 4928) about charsets and Crt was added to bugtracker recently: Simply include uses crt; and your write() output is garbled. I use Russian language, win32, codepage 1251. Some symbols are substituted by question marks, some --- by other

Re: [fpc-devel] Unit linking to .obj files and fpcmake.

2006-04-11 Thread Tomas Hajny
Daniël Mantione wrote: Op Tue, 11 Apr 2006, schreef J. Peter Mugaas: Before mentioning that the .obj files are not supported, I am aware that this has not been tested. I wish to see if this can work (you don't know until you try). It is not a matter of .obj not been tested, it is a matter

Re: [fpc-devel] Output flush on pipes

2006-05-14 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 14 May 06, at 19:20, Vincent Snijders wrote: Tomas Hajny wrote: On 14 May 06, at 8:54, Vincent Snijders wrote: Daniël Mantione wrote: Op Sun, 14 May 2006, schreef Martin Schreiber: Since some time FPC doesn't flush output on pipes after writeln. On linux I can use a pseudo terminal

Re: [fpc-devel] Re: dominant short strings in compiler source

2006-05-20 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 18 May 06, at 13:50, L505 wrote: . . have tight custom units with no end user units like sysutils. One way to accomplish this, like I've already mentioned, is to use shortstring/longstring/array of string/ based Dos unit, using shortstrings where necessary, arrays of strings where

Re: [fpc-devel] Re: dominant short strings in compiler source

2006-05-20 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 20 May 06, at 11:43, L505 wrote: . . have tight custom units with no end user units like sysutils. One way to accomplish this, like I've already mentioned, is to use shortstring/longstring/array of string/ based Dos unit, using shortstrings where necessary, arrays of

Re: [fpc-devel] Definition of the time-fration in a TDateTime before30/12/1899

2006-05-23 Thread Tomas Hajny
Jonas Maebe wrote: On 23 mei 2006, at 09:41, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: I agree here. New tests can be added with fpcunit. But the basic principe of using the halt and the dotest program needs to stay in place. That is one of the problems of fpcunit: it runs a lot of tests in 1 program.

Re: [fpc-devel] Definition of the time-fration in a TDateTimebefore30/12/1899

2006-05-23 Thread Tomas Hajny
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: On 5/23/06, Tomas Hajny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Couldn't it happen that one of the tests just crashes the whole program, so further tests are not run at all then? Nope. That is the beauty of xUnit testing frameworks. A Failures (something you are testing

[fpc-devel] Localizations to Catalan and Hebrew?

2006-06-21 Thread Tomas Hajny
Hello *, As part of 2.0.4 release preparations, we'd like to bring up to date existing message file localizations whereever possible. Apparently, our contacts to original contributors of localizations to Catalan and Hebrew are broken now. Are there any volunteers to take over? BTW,

Re: [fpc-devel] FPC 2.0.4 release candidate 1 testing

2006-07-11 Thread Tomas Hajny
Hello, As a follow-up to previous message sent by Jonas (see below), I'd like to ask whether there's anybody interested in testing of Win32 and powerpc-linux versions, and at least one more person for i386-linux. Tomas --- Forwarded message follows --- To: FPC

Re: [fpc-devel] FPC Wiki spam protection

2006-07-14 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 14 Jul 06, at 0:07, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: Hello, Every time I edit fpc wiki it will say I entered a new url, and I need to type a number, even if no new url is entered. And it´s a little annoying. You mean the calculation excercise? What a pitty it isn't little bit more

Re: [fpc-devel] make deb with Ubuntu Linux error

2006-07-16 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 16 Jul 06, at 13:52, J. Peter Mugaas wrote: I was doing a make deb from the fpcbuild trunk svn branch using Ubuntu Linux 6.06 and I got an error. . . . cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/grab_vcsa.1': No such file or directory . . I added the missing files now, try

Re: [fpc-devel] make deb with Ubuntu Linux error

2006-07-16 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 16 Jul 06, at 15:42, J. Peter Mugaas wrote: On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 20:14:14 +0200, Tomas Hajny wrote: On 16 Jul 06, at 13:52, J. Peter Mugaas wrote: I tried again and I now get this: === LaTeX Warning: Reference `se:commanddialogs' on page 58 undefined on input line 1538. [58

Re: [fpc-devel] fpc 2.0.4 rc2 and mse

2006-07-17 Thread Tomas Hajny
Den Jean wrote: Hi, MSE created some patches for fpc 2.0.4 rc1 to fix some widestring and db issues. http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.cgi/mseide-msegui/trunk/patch_fpc_2_0_4/ I seems they are not applied to rc2. . . Thanks for this information. There's been no decision made in the

[fpc-devel] Re: Testing of FPC 2.0.4 release candidates - next round

2006-07-18 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 14 Jul 06, at 9:52, Tomas Hajny wrote: Hi again, We're about to start preparation for the next round of testing of release candidates for 2.0.4 after this weekend. More platforms and builds should be included this time - in addition to those available in RC1, we expect to have at least

Re: [fpc-devel] Mac OS X Quickstart section in README file

2006-07-18 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 18 Jul 06, at 8:55, Dr. Karl-Michael Schindler wrote: There is no Mac OS X Quickstart section in the install/doc/readme.txt file, although needed, in particular for the ReadMe.txt File of Mac OS X .dmg package. . . Many thanks, it's being added to SVN now and should appear in 2.0.4.

[fpc-devel] FPC 2.0.4-rc2 testing started

2006-07-19 Thread Tomas Hajny
Hello everybody, We've entered a new round of testing of release candidates for upcoming FPC 2.0.4. Builds for most platforms are already available for download from ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/beta/2.0.4- rc2/ (additional platforms to appear there soon). You're certainly welcome to have

Re: [fpc-devel] 2.0.4-rc2 macosx stuff

2006-07-20 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 20 Jul 06, at 21:11, Jonas Maebe wrote: On 20 Jul 2006, at 15:18, Schindler Karl-Michael wrote: . . http://michael-ep3.physik.uni-halle.de/fpc.info and http://michael-ep3.physik.uni-halle.de/fpc-doc.info I think the .info files should go to fpcbuild/tags/

Re: [fpc-devel] 2.0.4-rc2 macosx stuff

2006-07-21 Thread Tomas Hajny
Schindler Karl-Michael wrote: Am 20. Jul 2006 um 22:33 schrieb Tomas Hajny: . . 3) The files get tagged and exported as before (let me know whether you prefer .tar.gz or .zip sources in future builds - we can have both if needed). I would prefer tar.gz, since it is smaller. Will do

Re: [fpc-devel] FPC 2.0.4 changelog

2006-07-27 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 25 Jul 06, at 22:10, Alexander Todorov wrote: Hello, is it possible to include the following information in the next releases changelog: 1) closed / fixed issues in mantis - issue number 2) the short description from mantis ? This way it will be very easy to see what has been fixed and

RE: [fpc-devel] bug in fpc 2.0.4 rc 2 (go32v2)?

2006-08-12 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 12 Aug 06, at 14:22, Lee, John wrote: Please send a short (less than 20-50 lines if possible) program that fails. Regards John Well, after playing fpctris (compiled for GO32v2 with 2.0.4-rc3) for a while, it certainly doesn't seem to be valid for all programs using unit Graph. OTOH, I

Re: [fpc-devel] patch testreport

2006-08-13 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 13 Aug 06, at 20:25, Darius Blaszijk wrote: From: Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 7:10 PM On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, Darius Blaszijk wrote: Hi Michael, Thanks, but I have a question. Following the testreport patch, I have also a patch for the

Re: [fpc-devel] patch testreport

2006-08-13 Thread Tomas Hajny
be broken. The define would eventually be removed once Lazarus proceeds to 2.2 FPC version but would never hurt keeping the define. Well, it wouldn't be broken, but it wouldn't keep the plain text output feature either. ;-) Tomas - Original Message - From: Tomas Hajny [EMAIL

[fpc-devel] 2.0.4-rc3 available

2006-08-13 Thread Tomas Hajny
Hello, I'd like to announce that the third (and hopefully last) release candidate for FPC 2.0.4 is available for download for most platforms (i386-linux, x86_64-linux, i386-win32, powerpc- macosx, i386-go32v2, arm-linux and powerpc- linux). You can download it from

Re: [fpc-devel] 2.0.4-rc3 available

2006-08-14 Thread Tomas Hajny
Dave Parsons wrote: On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:08:29 +0200, Tomas Hajny wrote: Hello Dave, I'd like to announce that the third (and hopefully last) release candidate for FPC 2.0.4 is available for download for most platforms (i386-linux, x86_64-linux, i386-win32, powerpc- macosx, i386-go32v2

Re: [fpc-devel] 2.0.4-rc3 available

2006-08-14 Thread Tomas Hajny
Dave Parsons wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:15:51 +0200 (CEST), Tomas Hajny wrote: Dave Parsons wrote: On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:08:29 +0200, Tomas Hajny wrote: . . I realize that OS/2 and OpenVMS are fringe operating systems so I expect to have to do some development of both fpc Lazarus

Re: [fpc-devel] 2.0.4-rc3 available

2006-08-15 Thread Tomas Hajny
Dave Parsons wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:01:10 +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote: On 14 aug 2006, at 17:44, Peter Vreman wrote: And you need GNU (cross)binutils for the target platform Or you can compile to assembler code, copy all assembler files and the linker script to the target machine and

Re: [fpc-devel] 2.0.4-rc3 available

2006-08-15 Thread Tomas Hajny
Marco van de Voort wrote: I don't know yet whether it will be worth the effort, but it looks as though it could be done if necessary. It isn't. I never saw the TP compilability of later 1.0.x versions confirmed, and even before 1.0 times, special care need to be taken (due to TP's memory

Re: [fpc-devel] 2.0.4-rc3 available

2006-08-15 Thread Tomas Hajny
Dave Parsons wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:48:55 +0200 (CEST), Tomas Hajny wrote: Dave Parsons wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:15:51 +0200 (CEST), Tomas Hajny wrote: Dave Parsons wrote: On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:08:29 +0200, Tomas Hajny wrote: . . 2) Function for accessing ports requires

Re: [fpc-devel] 2.0.4-rc3 available

2006-08-15 Thread Tomas Hajny
Marco van de Voort wrote: Dave Parsons wrote: Has there been any discussion/attempt to get away from GDB and integrate a native FPC solution? Using an external debugger doesn't seem ideal to me. It isn't ideal indeed. Creating a debugger requires some time, though. You need modules for

Re: Assembler (Intel) inconsistencies in 2.0.x, Was: Re: [fpc-devel]Bug: compilation loop in 2.0.2 when using -So

2006-08-18 Thread Tomas Hajny
Konstantin Münning wrote: Jonas Maebe wrote: On 18 aug 2006, at 14:56, Konstantin Münning wrote: . . PROCEDURE Test(l:LongInt);ASSEMBLER; ASM mov eax,[l] END; PROCEDURE Test;ASSEMBLER; VAR l:LongInt; ASM mov eax,[l] END; BTW, putting the lines above into a file, adding the

[fpc-devel] FPC 2.0.4 is out!

2006-08-28 Thread Tomas Hajny
Hello everybody, I'm happy to announce that release 2.0.4 is finally out, bringing you lots of fixes and some enhancements over the previous officially released versions. I hope you'll enjoy the release, special thanks go to all of you who helped us with their all kinds of contributions

Re: [fpc-devel] FPC 2.0.4 is out!

2006-08-29 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 29 Aug 06, at 18:46, Rob van der Linde wrote: . . I would love to be a maintainer and build .deb files, however I do not own a 64 bit CPU and can't afford one at the moment because it would also mean a new motherboard and RAM too, so that crosses me out pretty much. In fact, I really

Re: [fpc-devel] FPC 2.0.4 is out!

2006-08-29 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 29 Aug 06, at 19:50, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: peter green schrieb: . . [1] The current issue: Until freepascal 2.0.4-rc3 the deb build worked as it should, but with the the final release is fails. The reason was the missing libgdb binary. So I downloaded it and it worked again, but it

RE: [fpc-devel] FPC 2.0.4 is out!

2006-08-29 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 29 Aug 06, at 22:05, peter green wrote: For the recursive build-dep. This is a onetime issue. This is making the rather uncertain assumption that each version can be built with the last (not true with all 1.9.x versions though maybe more effort is being made post 2.0.0). FPC policy is

Re: [fpc-devel] GO32V2 Graph Bug?

2006-09-10 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 10 Sep 06, at 21:27, Daniël Mantione wrote: Op Sun, 10 Sep 2006, schreef Steve: I downloaded FP not long ago and have been trying to shift over and add some things a Borland Pascal program that controls stepper motors for a cnc machine (needs Dos for critical timing of motor pulses). I

Re: [fpc-devel] strange code in TThread in classesh.inc

2006-09-29 Thread Tomas Hajny
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: What is the point of these ifdef's, they are identical in the sense of variable names and types...? --Line 1208 in classesh.inc snip property Terminated: Boolean read FTerminated; {$ifdef Unix} private // see tthread.inc,

Re: [fpc-devel] fpcsrc/rtl/unix/video.pp

2006-11-03 Thread Tomas Hajny
Daniël Mantione wrote: Op Fri, 3 Nov 2006, schreef Tomas Hajny: This is something to be addressed in video.pp - we need to detect the character set supported by console at startup (optionally with a possibility to change it later on). This is something we partly touched in discussion

Re: [fpc-devel] fpcsrc/rtl/unix/video.pp

2006-11-03 Thread Tomas Hajny
Micha Nelissen napsal(a): ik wrote: The part after the dot in $LANG. It's possible though that there is no dot, no idea what to do, maybe assume iso-8859-1 ? No, that will be really bad idea to assume iso-8859-1 . It really depends on the country and language code. For example : It doesn't

Re: [fpc-devel] fpcsrc/rtl/unix/video.pp

2006-11-03 Thread Tomas Hajny
ik wrote: On 11/3/06, Micha Nelissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tomas Hajny wrote: Does anybody here have an idea how to address that issue in Unix/Linux environment (like an environment variable similar to TERM, etc.)? I can The part after the dot in $LANG. It's possible though

Re: [fpc-devel] fpcsrc/rtl/unix/video.pp

2006-11-04 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 3 Nov 06, at 20:32, ik wrote: On 11/3/06, Tomas Hajny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ik wrote: On 11/3/06, Micha Nelissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tomas Hajny wrote: Does anybody here have an idea how to address that issue in Unix/Linux environment (like an environment variable

Re: [fpc-devel] 'daemon' units in Lazarus (to Michael van Canneyt ?)

2007-02-14 Thread Tomas Hajny
Vincent Snijders wrote: Michael Schnell schreef: The URL for tortoiseSVN is http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/trunk Right. That is exactly what I did. The other error message I got was PROFIND request failed on '/svn/fpc/trunk'. That is the error I get too, because of a broken or

Re: [fpc-devel] graph module

2007-03-09 Thread Tomas Hajny
Daniël Mantione wrote: Op Fri, 9 Mar 2007, schreef Evgeniy Ivanov: Hi Evgeniy, I tried to use freepascal' graph module based on svgalib but from my point of view it's not comfortable: I need root prevelege or to remember what to do with *ids (uid and so on). Also I have a problems with

Re: [fpc-devel] graph module

2007-03-09 Thread Tomas Hajny
Evgeniy Ivanov wrote: On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:36:40 +0300, Jonas Maebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:39:10 +0300, DaniĂŤl Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: . . Many people @ Pascal Game Development. Domique Louis (Savage) is also still maintaining it. Writing all the

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >