Re: [fpc-devel] Are "C style operators" default or not?
Sven Barth wrote: Am 27.03.2012 10:16, schrieb Patrick Chevalley: If you build your fpc.cfg using fpcmkcfg with the default template it add -Sgic. So C operator, C++ inline and goto are activated. I don't consider the config file as a base for default. In the specific case of FPC, I agree. In the general case, I agree except for cases where a configuration file is signed/checksummed so as to be intimately associated with the binaries. While most users might use that config file there could be users that don't. Although once FPC's been installed as a binary on a given system a tailored fpc.cfg will exist, so it's very easy to forget about it when subsequently building from source. Also it's perfectly legal to use fpc with "-n" which tell to compiler to not load a config file at all. Although in this case you'll fairly rapidly have problems with some of the system libraries. In general fpcmkcfg etc. does a sterling job of working out where everything is, although I had a bit of grief with this with Solaris a year or so ago. -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] Are "C style operators" default or not?
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:41:58 +1100 Alexander Klenin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 19:30, Mark Morgan Lloyd > wrote: > > Gennadiy Poryev wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I’ve recently ran into weird problem with “C style operators”. Though the > >> story is about Lazarus, I thought I better ask it here. All of a sudden, my > >> Lazarus trunk had refused to build > >> (http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=21571 ) and I've tracked the > >> problem > >> to the use of "+=" operator somewhere in the recent revisions. Apparently > >> this is easily fixed by adding -Sc compiler option to the makefile, had it > >> not been the fact that I seem to be the only one experiencing this issue :( > >> How this can be? I use latest fpc trunk with no self-made modifications, > >> and > >> it thinks that -Sc is not the default. Please enlighten me on this. > > > > > > Didn't see it last week compiling Lazarus trunk on x86 (32-bit) using 2.6.0. > > Some parts of Lazarus (TAChart for sure) enable this option at package level, > to avoid accidental breakage. New Lazarus packages use -Sgic by default since the beginning. So I guess the biggest part of Lazarus packages use them. Mattias ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] Are "C style operators" default or not?
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 19:30, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Gennadiy Poryev wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I’ve recently ran into weird problem with “C style operators”. Though the >> story is about Lazarus, I thought I better ask it here. All of a sudden, my >> Lazarus trunk had refused to build >> (http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=21571 ) and I've tracked the problem >> to the use of "+=" operator somewhere in the recent revisions. Apparently >> this is easily fixed by adding -Sc compiler option to the makefile, had it >> not been the fact that I seem to be the only one experiencing this issue :( >> How this can be? I use latest fpc trunk with no self-made modifications, and >> it thinks that -Sc is not the default. Please enlighten me on this. > > > Didn't see it last week compiling Lazarus trunk on x86 (32-bit) using 2.6.0. Some parts of Lazarus (TAChart for sure) enable this option at package level, to avoid accidental breakage. -- Alexander S. Klenin ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] Are "C style operators" default or not?
Gennadiy Poryev wrote: Hi all, I’ve recently ran into weird problem with “C style operators”. Though the story is about Lazarus, I thought I better ask it here. All of a sudden, my Lazarus trunk had refused to build (http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=21571 ) and I've tracked the problem to the use of "+=" operator somewhere in the recent revisions. Apparently this is easily fixed by adding -Sc compiler option to the makefile, had it not been the fact that I seem to be the only one experiencing this issue :( How this can be? I use latest fpc trunk with no self-made modifications, and it thinks that -Sc is not the default. Please enlighten me on this. Didn't see it last week compiling Lazarus trunk on x86 (32-bit) using 2.6.0. -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] Are "C style operators" default or not?
Am 27.03.2012 10:16, schrieb Patrick Chevalley: If you build your fpc.cfg using fpcmkcfg with the default template it add -Sgic. So C operator, C++ inline and goto are activated. I don't consider the config file as a base for default. While most users might use that config file there could be users that don't. Also it's perfectly legal to use fpc with "-n" which tell to compiler to not load a config file at all. Regards, Sven ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] Are "C style operators" default or not?
Am 27.03.2012 10:15, schrieb Juha Manninen: On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Gennadiy Poryev mailto:c...@barvinok.net>> wrote: > As far as I can see from the source the default should be "not enabled". It is fixed in Lazarus svn r36376 by explicitly specifying -Sci in makefile. Sorry for raising the question here, I didn't anticipate it to be solved so fast. Why did it work for others, including me? I didn't set -Sci anywhere. Maybe because as Patrick wrote the fpc.cfg file enables the C-operators. Regards, Sven ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] Are "C style operators" default or not?
If you build your fpc.cfg using fpcmkcfg with the default template it add -Sgic. So C operator, C++ inline and goto are activated. Patrick ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] Are "C style operators" default or not?
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Gennadiy Poryev wrote: > > As far as I can see from the source the default should be "not enabled". > > It is fixed in Lazarus svn r36376 by explicitly specifying -Sci in > makefile. > Sorry for raising the question here, I didn't anticipate it to be solved > so fast. > Why did it work for others, including me? I didn't set -Sci anywhere. Juha ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
RE: [fpc-devel] Are "C style operators" default or not?
> As far as I can see from the source the default should be "not enabled". It is fixed in Lazarus svn r36376 by explicitly specifying -Sci in makefile. Sorry for raising the question here, I didn't anticipate it to be solved so fast. ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] Are "C style operators" default or not?
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Sven Barth wrote: Am 27.03.2012 07:47, schrieb Gennadiy Poryev: Hi all, I’ve recently ran into weird problem with “C style operators”. Though the story is about Lazarus, I thought I better ask it here. All of a sudden, my Lazarus trunk had refused to build (http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=21571 ) and I've tracked the problem to the use of "+=" operator somewhere in the recent revisions. Apparently this is easily fixed by adding -Sc compiler option to the makefile, had it not been the fact that I seem to be the only one experiencing this issue :( How this can be? I use latest fpc trunk with no self-made modifications, and it thinks that -Sc is not the default. Please enlighten me on this. As far as I can see from the source the default should be "not enabled". I had the same problems. C style operators are by default off. Michael.___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] Are "C style operators" default or not?
Am 27.03.2012 07:47, schrieb Gennadiy Poryev: Hi all, I’ve recently ran into weird problem with “C style operators”. Though the story is about Lazarus, I thought I better ask it here. All of a sudden, my Lazarus trunk had refused to build (http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=21571 ) and I've tracked the problem to the use of "+=" operator somewhere in the recent revisions. Apparently this is easily fixed by adding -Sc compiler option to the makefile, had it not been the fact that I seem to be the only one experiencing this issue :( How this can be? I use latest fpc trunk with no self-made modifications, and it thinks that -Sc is not the default. Please enlighten me on this. As far as I can see from the source the default should be "not enabled". Regards, Sven ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
[fpc-devel] Are "C style operators" default or not?
Hi all, I’ve recently ran into weird problem with “C style operators”. Though the story is about Lazarus, I thought I better ask it here. All of a sudden, my Lazarus trunk had refused to build (http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=21571 ) and I've tracked the problem to the use of "+=" operator somewhere in the recent revisions. Apparently this is easily fixed by adding -Sc compiler option to the makefile, had it not been the fact that I seem to be the only one experiencing this issue :( How this can be? I use latest fpc trunk with no self-made modifications, and it thinks that -Sc is not the default. Please enlighten me on this. // Gennadiy. ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
