Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
I'll be digging further in.
Here goes. I modified the test so that it fails reliably, and patched
the compiler so that is doesn't fail again.
It was a bit tricky to get a string with refcount=1 without telling the
compiler to take its address.
As
Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
I'll be digging further in.
Here goes. I modified the test so that it fails reliably, and patched
the compiler so that is doesn't fail again.
It was a bit tricky to get a string with refcount=1 without telling the
compiler to take its address.
As for the patch, I could
